Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Although it may be worth going back in a while if we can crack nuclear fusion. There's a hell of a lot more helium-3 on the moon than there is on earth. A shuttle-full would power the USA for a whole year.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:57, 2 replies, latest was 17 years ago)
Lazy buggers. Too many tea breaks and not enough calculus.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:03, Reply)
Problem is, we're still putting in more energy to the reactor than we're getting out of it.
Hopefully ITER will sort that out, but it's not built yet.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:05, Reply)
it'll be the LHC all over again.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:06, Reply)
I forget the world still hadn't imploded. When they turning that on again, or have I missed the panic?
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:08, Reply)
lies with engineers, rather than scientists. Scientists have proved fusion will work. Now we need some clever engineers to build a machine to make it happen.
Sorry - some HMHB just came into my head there - "Make it happen, bass player"
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:09, Reply)
...moom missions are on the agenda for India, China, the USA, Europe and Japan who are all a tad strapped for future reserves of clean energy.
He3 on the moon could cover all of humanity's energy needs for the next millenia - if we get the engineering problems for fusion cracked of course. $100 per barrel of oil should provide the incentive for that.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:58, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread