
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Although it may be worth going back in a while if we can crack nuclear fusion. There's a hell of a lot more helium-3 on the moon than there is on earth. A shuttle-full would power the USA for a whole year.
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:57, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

Lazy buggers. Too many tea breaks and not enough calculus.
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:03, Reply)

Problem is, we're still putting in more energy to the reactor than we're getting out of it.
Hopefully ITER will sort that out, but it's not built yet.
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:05, Reply)

it'll be the LHC all over again.
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:06, Reply)

I forget the world still hadn't imploded. When they turning that on again, or have I missed the panic?
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:08, Reply)

lies with engineers, rather than scientists. Scientists have proved fusion will work. Now we need some clever engineers to build a machine to make it happen.
Sorry - some HMHB just came into my head there - "Make it happen, bass player"
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:09, Reply)

...moom missions are on the agenda for India, China, the USA, Europe and Japan who are all a tad strapped for future reserves of clean energy.
He3 on the moon could cover all of humanity's energy needs for the next millenia - if we get the engineering problems for fusion cracked of course. $100 per barrel of oil should provide the incentive for that.
( , Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:58, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread