
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

All countries seem to have some degree of educational patriotism (we don't really hear how bad the empire was). But I think anyone who is even slightly aware of their surrondings will learn more than what's on the curriculum by the time they're out of school.
Yes I believe so, although it's possible it wouldn't have got so far and been so anti jew.
I weigh less now than I did in year 11.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 19:51, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

just I was bigger at school when I played rugby and ate my mothers cooking.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:00, Reply)

-Winston Churchill
What I mean is, all history is bias. It's impossible to write impartially.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 19:54, Reply)

Not taking into account historiography, what about contested battles; a "glorious victory" or "disastrous defeat"?
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:00, Reply)

Because Churchill was a pretty useless parliamentarian of no fixed political allegiance.
He was largely responsible for one of the most appalling disasters of the First World War (Gallipoli) and managed to get himself and his men captured during the Boer war, so frankly he was, on the face of it, absolutely unsuitable for any sort of military leadership.
There's no denying his genius at rhetoric during WW2, but that was about as much as he was capable of - stirring rhetoric. Yalta was all about Roosevelt and Stalin, and the strategists were the military chiefs of staff.
Now we are told that he was our greatest ever statesman. I'd beg to differ.
Edit - missed the last line. A 90 foot tall statue of me, but with six arms, is shortly to be erected on a prominent hilltop, paid for by public subscription. I will be depicted wearing a corduroy dressing gown and striped pantaloons. I am satisfied with these arrangements.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:10, Reply)

Seriously though. Epic battle between Thucydides and Herodotus. One writing "clinical" scientific history. One writing PEOPLE history. Which would you rather read? I'm going with the giant ants.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:22, Reply)

Becky wanted to know magnificent things about me. You ain't going to get much more magnificent than a 90' six armed statue.
What should I be holding in four of my hands? I'll be needing a glass of Merlot in one hand and a Rothmans in the other.
That leaves four spare.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:33, Reply)

as it was a reply to me and all...Sozbbz.
A couple of cocks?
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:37, Reply)

I'm a male man, y'see.
And straight. Though currently in remission.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:43, Reply)

I have one that's pretty much redundant.
Maybe I could have a mouth organ in one hand, a kitten in another, a book in the third and a picture of a furry dwarf in the last.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:56, Reply)

multiple sources may counteract the bias, but it's still up to the reader to judge which one is true.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 20:23, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread