Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
who would do worse than him if they thought they could get away with it. Bunch of cunts the lot of them. I remember when the Daily Star had it's "Name and Shame" campaign for peados and they put someones photo on the front page who had nothing to do with anything. The editor should have been publicly flogged and then hung for that.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:52, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
They actually love all the disgusting details. THAT'S why they want to know what he did. They want to sit and enjoy it over a nice cuppa.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:02, Reply)
end up attacking a doctor after the Star (or was it News of the World?) mistakenly labelled a registered paediatrician as a paedophile?
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:11, Reply)
With screams of "she gives sweets to children after touching them"
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:13, Reply)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4719364.stm
But judging by some of the placards you see mis-spelling paedophile, it's not unlikely.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:14, Reply)

(Also one of the few with correct spelling, I notice...)
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:17, Reply)
As though it should be followed by more bunting, reading "for the lads".
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:19, Reply)
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:35, Reply)
Or females?
Becuse if it's females in general, that figures.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:51, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread