b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 677065 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

aren't tons bigger than tonnes?

(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:25, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
that's the jist of what al said, yes
:)
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:26, Reply)
the way he has written it looks like
6 tons = 5.44 tones
or 6.61 tons = 6 tonnes

which is the other way round
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:29, Reply)
No it doesn't, it looks like
6 tons = 5.44 tonnes
or 6 tonnes = 6.61 tons

Which is exactly what I wrote, but I used my words instead of numbers and equals signs.
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:33, Reply)
it amounts to the same thing though, 1 tonne is larger than 1 ton
which is the opposite to what I had previously thought, which was why I was saying it looks like you'd written that
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:35, Reply)
No 1 ton = 0.901 tonnes
so a tonne is slightly more than a ton
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:29, Reply)
well there you go

(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:29, Reply)
It depends
on whether you are talking about long tons or short tons though!

1 metric tonne is equal to 1.102 short tons, but only 0.9842 long tons.
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:31, Reply)
I like how both long and short tons are exactly 20 hundredweights
but it depends if you are using long or short hundredweights!
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:34, Reply)
makes you wonder why we changed to metric
when the old way was much simpler
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:35, Reply)
In the same way
a long hundred of herrings is actually 132 herrings.

Fishermen weren't that good at counting in the old days.

Edit - according to Google, a long hundred is 120. But in my old Collins Gem dictionary, it definitely says 132.
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:35, Reply)
I expect a lot of the fisherman came from the west country
and brighton
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:39, Reply)
Apparently
in Roxburghshire, in the Scottish borders, sheep and lambs were sold by the hundred, but this was actually 106 animals.
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:42, Reply)
maybe it allowed for a few dieing before they got them home

(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:43, Reply)
I was wondering about that.
Or it may have been a backhander. A hundred for the boss, and keep half a dozen for yerself, mate.
(, Mon 29 Mar 2010, 9:47, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1