Well why the fuck call it feminism if it is for all?
That's just downright rude and confusing that is.

In which case I will now support it fully as well as my favourite egalitarianism. TBH anything that improves the lot of disadvantaged people (for whatever reason) is ok in my book. Every little helps (Philosophy 101 - The Tesco Principle).
(porkylips looks better as the sun goes down., Wed 31 Mar 2010, 15:36, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

I agree, the language is not ideal.
The principles, however, are much fairer.

I suppose it could be argued that the current default state in our society is 'masculinism' and that 'feminism' seeks to redress the balance. I don't like the fact that the term 'feminism' can be construed as some kind of female superiority agenda (hence me banging on about how it's actually an attempt at gaining equal opportunities and rights).
( crackhouseceilidhband Fuck off back to Mumsnet, Wed 31 Mar 2010, 16:06, Reply)

Thank you
you said what most people think clearly :)

Feminism is not pro women at the expense of men. On the other hand a lot of people don't grasp the semantics- like the difference between women's history and gender history.
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Wed 31 Mar 2010, 16:25, Reply)