b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 719500 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Still? I'm sick of hearing about it.
Talking head after talking head being wheeled out more or less at random to speculate on the radio about what might happen, all the left-wing media speculating that this could be the best thing that ever happened to Britain's voting system, all the right-wing media speculating that it's the worst thing to happen to this country since some plonker gave women the vote. So much endless fucking speculation that has pushed aside all other news - can people not just shut the fuck up until some combination of the three main parties has finally come to a decision?

I know I've been whinging about this a lot, and I apologise. I know it should be interesting, but all this interminable speculation does seem, to me, to be about as much use as publishing an interview in which you ask someone: "You clearly don't know what's going on as you're not in the same room as any of Cameron, Clegg or Brown...but what do you reckon might be happening? Can you imagine what it would be like to know about it? Please feel free to imagine a conversation over tea and biscuits with the three aforementioned party leaders and from that point make stuff up as you go along."

EDIT: Ah, right, didn't realise it was the asking-the-Queen-to-sign-his-permission-slip that made you laugh! Fair enough, though I stand by the above disgruntled ramble.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:52, 4 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Isn't that just the news nowadays though?
Endless speculation?
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:54, Reply)
There is a lot of that
But every so often I like to be told when something has happened. You know, to have something reported. It look as though it could be a few more days before any decision is made, so why can't the papers leave them to it and find other stuff to report on and/or speculate about?

I know, I know, no paper wants to be the one that misses out when the decision is finally announced, but can't they just...ease off a bit?
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:56, Reply)
I agree, it drives me mad
which is why I limit myself to one bout of news a day (usually the 6pm BBC news).
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:58, Reply)
Like Bruce Forsyth's expert opinion

(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:30, Reply)
It might as well be, given some of the idiots who've been given a space to comment on it...

(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:33, Reply)
They did a little segment
on HIGNFY about that
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 19:05, Reply)
Well, that as well
It's the whole procedure. The fact that you voted 5 days ago and you still haven't got a goverment (apart from the Queen)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:57, Reply)
the Queen isn't our government
she's a formality. It's pretty simple
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:07, Reply)
Right
Let's not discuss about this again.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:08, Reply)
this guy is more interesting and entertaining than most
www.b3ta.com/links/Hung_Parliament_in_3_minutes
and it's done by a child.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:58, Reply)
That is very good
Shame the papers couldn't have been that concise with it!
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:07, Reply)
It's all a massive heap of tedious bollocks.

(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:01, Reply)
It is that
I've never seen bollocks heaped so high, let alone those of the tedious variety.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:09, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1