Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
Sky reporting that he's stepped down as PM.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:36, 75 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Lib-Dem Labour talks have reportedly failed, but it's not the same thing.
"Gordon Brown has not resigned" the PM Spokesman has told Reuters.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:51, Reply)
Ja.
Lars Lokke Rasmussen, since 2007.
(I live in London now though)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:39, Reply)
It's exciting to see an election which I'm effected by but can't vote in.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:48, Reply)
But decided not to (I'd have to stop voting in Spain).
Now, if they repeat it in 1 year or so, I might give it a go.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:49, Reply)
I go home to vote whenever we have an election wherever I am in the world. It feels like I am doing something for the country.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:51, Reply)
However, my country is doomed, so I don't think I can do much more for them with a piece of paper. I might as well use it in a country were the expenses scandal is a scandal.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:53, Reply)
Svenska -- including the *gorgeous* Princess Madeleine.
Were I not getting married on Saturday ...
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:49, Reply)
And I don't like them either.
I find funny the fact that, despite the election results, your PM still has 2 things to do:
1. Ask consent from the Queen
2. Step down as PM
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:51, Reply)
I just find difficult to understand that, if Gordon Brownd decides to stay as PM, even if LibDem and Tories agree to work together, he could do it.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:54, Reply)
he was in charge until a decision could be reached. If LibDems and Conservatives formed a coalition, he would not be PM
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:55, Reply)
That as nobody got absolute mayority (?) he could stay as PM, even if his party is not in power.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:58, Reply)
if Labour is not part of the government formed then he couldn't remain as PM
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:06, Reply)
I was explained that, until now, that has been just good manners, but not a law. That's one of the first things they want to change about your election system and put it in writing.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:07, Reply)
It's a nice, clear (and most importantly, concise!) explanation of the situation.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:13, Reply)
But I'll do it when I get home (I have a long lonely evening in front of me)
If you are right, I'll be more than happy to correct my colleages at work :)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:15, Reply)
but in fact Labour could remain as government until defeated by a vote of no confidence. This would almost certainly be at the Queen's speech.
So, in effect they are out.
Unless a Lib Lab pact can protect them from a VoNC.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:17, Reply)
They were laughing at the situation, as it'd mean that Brown would be PM, but with no power at all.
That's as well why they want to put in writing that he has to step down, rather than leaving it as good manners only.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:20, Reply)
Even though it is a parliamentary government, there is still *one* person who must give permission.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:56, Reply)
my post probably counts as treason. If that were still a punishable offence, I think I could live with the additional consequence of the pro-royal /offtopicers being upset with me.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:15, Reply)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:19, Reply)
However, he keept asking me, when I started voting at 18, "If this is a real democracy, and you choose who is in the goverment, why cannot you choose if you want a king or not?"
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:22, Reply)
as such. But I certainly wouldn't want to abolish the monarchy. Make of that what you will
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:22, Reply)
(At least, I've mellowed over the years)
If they still turn a profit as the world's biggest hereditary tourist attraction, then they can carry on as figureheads, I just think it's time we did away with these dreadfully dated parts of the constitution (e.g., as Larry describes it "a democracy, unless the Queen says otherwise"). I know she doesn't wield any real power, it just strikes me as immensely hypocritical that we blunder round the world preaching the benefits and virtues of democracy when our own official head of state is appointed autocratically.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:26, Reply)
Do you think he'll go with the royals or against them?
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:23, Reply)
It's /talkers he gets upset with. Not sure who would have a monarchy flounce...
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:28, Reply)
Everything goes too fast to follow.
Going home now, have a good evening!
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:30, Reply)
(Sorry, I don't speak Spanish so French will have to suffice)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:31, Reply)
But your Princess Madeleine is *GORGEOUS* though.
Not quite as gorgeous as my future wife, mind (just-in-case-she's-reading-this).
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:53, Reply)
But on the positive side:
1. I'm not Jonas Bergstrom
2. I'm not a Swedish lawyer
3. I like horses
On the downside (viz a possible marriage to HRH)
1. Am getting married on Saturday
2. Am Danish
3. Am not Swedish
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:59, Reply)
Although they go home too early during the week and get too drunk at weekends.
I'm sure your wife to be is a lot nicer than any princess.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:00, Reply)
And she's a lovely person. I'd imagine that Princesses are, well, princesses.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:06, Reply)
Wow! Just a few days to go!
Are you marrying here or back home?
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:26, Reply)
Both families coming over - as it turns out we went to the same school and we hated each other as school kids. Scary.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:32, Reply)
the King was in hospital over the weekend, having a cyst (or something) removed
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:16, Reply)
He's just gone out of hospital. No cancer, it seems.
I quite like him, as he could have chosen to have a military goverment after Franco, but went for democracy. I don't like the fact that Spaniards have to pay him and all his family a salary for doing nothing (although the 2 princess work, they get money from the gov)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:25, Reply)
works (or used to) 10 minutes walk from my house.
King was treated not 20 minutes away as well.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:44, Reply)
Talking head after talking head being wheeled out more or less at random to speculate on the radio about what might happen, all the left-wing media speculating that this could be the best thing that ever happened to Britain's voting system, all the right-wing media speculating that it's the worst thing to happen to this country since some plonker gave women the vote. So much endless fucking speculation that has pushed aside all other news - can people not just shut the fuck up until some combination of the three main parties has finally come to a decision?
I know I've been whinging about this a lot, and I apologise. I know it should be interesting, but all this interminable speculation does seem, to me, to be about as much use as publishing an interview in which you ask someone: "You clearly don't know what's going on as you're not in the same room as any of Cameron, Clegg or Brown...but what do you reckon might be happening? Can you imagine what it would be like to know about it? Please feel free to imagine a conversation over tea and biscuits with the three aforementioned party leaders and from that point make stuff up as you go along."
EDIT: Ah, right, didn't realise it was the asking-the-Queen-to-sign-his-permission-slip that made you laugh! Fair enough, though I stand by the above disgruntled ramble.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:52, Reply)
But every so often I like to be told when something has happened. You know, to have something reported. It look as though it could be a few more days before any decision is made, so why can't the papers leave them to it and find other stuff to report on and/or speculate about?
I know, I know, no paper wants to be the one that misses out when the decision is finally announced, but can't they just...ease off a bit?
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:56, Reply)
which is why I limit myself to one bout of news a day (usually the 6pm BBC news).
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:58, Reply)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:33, Reply)
It's the whole procedure. The fact that you voted 5 days ago and you still haven't got a goverment (apart from the Queen)
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:57, Reply)
she's a formality. It's pretty simple
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:07, Reply)
www.b3ta.com/links/Hung_Parliament_in_3_minutes
and it's done by a child.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 16:58, Reply)
Shame the papers couldn't have been that concise with it!
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:07, Reply)
I've never seen bollocks heaped so high, let alone those of the tedious variety.
(, Tue 11 May 2010, 17:09, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »