Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 8:40, 3 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
The best you can say about them is that occasionally they sound a bit like a mid-60s English pop band.
Praise indeed.
Tinny 80s production, weak songs and total cunts to boot. Anyone who's ever seen the 'fookin' amateurs' TV performance has to agree. They soundchecked for a TV slot and when it came to the actual performance turned everything up - consequently the electrics blew leaving them in the dark with only a mic on: and then had the cheek to blame the TV crew for being 'fookin' amateurs'. Sigh - witless northern cretins.
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 8:48, Reply)
sounds like they are the fucking amateurs
they had one song which had a good slide guitar intro, but I have no idea what it's called, and it went shit as soon as the guy starts singing
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 8:57, Reply)
If you felt like belming for Britian at any point it's a great clip to get you started.
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 9:01, Reply)
but more than likely I won't. It will have slipped my mind in a couple of seconds.
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 9:04, Reply)
Which is an awesome song. But it's absolutely true that they'd be a better band without any vocals
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 9:21, Reply)
cheers
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 9:21, Reply)
It's not. Try it.
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 8:57, Reply)
and if they said the Stone Roses were bad I'd be more inclined to think they were good.
(, Mon 17 May 2010, 8:59, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread