b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 725354 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Don't argue semantics with me young man.
Every body THINKS of nature as female.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:28, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I don't in the slightest
it is gender free. Like a table.

there's no need to go round anthropomorphising everything
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:29, Reply)
Well you would be different for different sakes.
AND EVERYBODY KNOWS TABLES ARE MALE.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:33, Reply)
They are females in Spanish
They feel female to me.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:34, Reply)
I always think of tables being dull and stupid.

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:36, Reply)
why not resort to tired generalisations based on sex?

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:37, Reply)
Ok I'll give it a go.

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:40, Reply)

www.threadbombing.com/data/media/54/facepalm_statue.jpg
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:43, Reply)
Haha!
I was being sarcastic.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:46, Reply)
really?

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:50, Reply)
Yup!

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:52, Reply)
Wow!

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:53, Reply)
I know!

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:54, Reply)
I'm not being different for differences sake
I honestly don't think that nature is a he or she. Nor is a table

The word may have a gender, depending on language, but not the thing.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:37, Reply)
I suppose you've never ever heard of the term Mother Nature.
I guess I do have Pagan tendancies which colour my view.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:39, Reply)
I have heard of it
that doesn't mean it is so

just because a certain group of people refer to something in a way doesn't mean it is true.

Nothing wrong with pagan tendencies.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:41, Reply)
You fucking druid

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:42, Reply)
Innit!
I love a bit of naked dancing round a fire.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:47, Reply)
Tales of the Unexpected?

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:47, Reply)
I used to love that programme.
Gave me the willies.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:49, Reply)
unexpected tails here too ;-)

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:50, Reply)
unexpected tails

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:49, Reply)
Dirty Ticket

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:54, Reply)
No they don't. I don't, Vipros doesn't.
That's two without trying desperately hard, isn't it?
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:42, Reply)
That's hardly a random section of the populace.
Two arguementative bastards.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:50, Reply)
it is actually my opinion
I'm not just being argumentative. You'd be surprised at how infrequently I'll argue something just for the sake of it
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:51, Reply)
Not with me it seems.

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:53, Reply)
that may be how you see it
but I wouldn't argue if I didn't believe what I was saying. What's the point?
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:54, Reply)
Your overwhelming desire to be right?

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:57, Reply)
in this particular instance I'm not arguing that you shouldn't say she about nature
I'm saying that not everyone thinks that.

it's not a question of being right
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 9:58, Reply)
Okay you win. I'm bored now.
What shall we argue about next?
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:01, Reply)
I don't argue just for the sake of it
www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post725456

interesting debates are fine, but the rapid recourse to discussing the nature of arguments each time kind of gets in the way
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:04, Reply)
You're no fun : (

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:06, Reply)
I am, but I see little point in arguing for the sake of it
or arguing with someone who is arguing for the sake of it.

:-P

now I really need to actually do some work!

see you later
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:07, Reply)
Verbal banter FTW!

(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:08, Reply)
better when it is complete nonsense or there is a point to it
anything in between is a waste of time!
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:11, Reply)
Again!
Okay you win.
(, Tue 18 May 2010, 10:16, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1