I followed Descartes through deconstructing all that we can say is True
Leading to the famous 'cogito ergo sum'. I don't agree with how he took this as a baseline to then go on to talk about the existence of a benevolent 'God', I stuck to the idea that everything apart from my own existence can be doubted.

However, that's not a way to live (solipsism or paranoia I guess), but I use it as an explanation for why I'm agnostic, and say that instead of following a religion, I follow my own morals, which essentially boil down to the 'do unto others' principal.
( Labia Majora You keep on talking but it makes no sense at all, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:12, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

I had the same problem with Descartes
His way of thinking made sense but at the same time, it sounds a bit like a desperate way to try to find something real to stuck to it.
(Aberracion Life's getting very complicated, but a lot of fun., Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:15, Reply)