Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
Except I'm taller, less successful, not lactose intolerant and don't believe in science, and she's also taller, more successful and gluten intolerant. And more attractive.
What TV or film couple reminds you of yourself and another? Doesn't have to be a romantic couple. Are you muscular and blonde, and is your cat large enough to saddle and ride, for example?
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 10:58, 223 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
You were talking about He-Man? The Master of the Universe? Or is that only the name in Spanish?
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:18, Reply)
but that was a pretty subtle comment :-)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:19, Reply)
It's a kid's joke in Spain, I'm not that clever (I should learn to shut up sometimes)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:26, Reply)
also, the hotness remark is debatable. Penny is totally hot sometimes, and merely regularly hot the rest of the time.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:00, Reply)
It's awesome
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:12, Reply)
No.
I'm only coming, 11th hour stylee, cos a mate of mine got VIP tickets and asked me to come with him.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:21, Reply)
Will be good to actually meet you, and Amberl. I don't expect to be able to hear for three days after Pendulum and Maiden on the Sunday night
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:26, Reply)
my mrs seems keen (for some reason)
won't be too bad hearing-wise. I've seen Deep Purple in an enclosed space. That was loud.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:29, Reply)
That left an impression
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:34, Reply)
Double headline tour, '98. They had a little known band called System of a Down supporting. Everyone says that must have been the gig of a lifetime. I say not - because Sepultura had just got rid of Max and were still finding their way, and SOAD are shit
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:42, Reply)
I hold a grudge against them cos I heard "Suite-Pee", "War" and "Know" on samplers before their first album came out and was consequently very excited as those are all top songs. They turned out to be the only good songs on the whole album and I've never forgiven their deception.
Or the fact that I haven't liked anything they've done since
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:51, Reply)
and some good ones on the other stuff as well
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:54, Reply)
Specific examples, please. And if you say "Sugar" I'll he-bitch man-slap you
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:55, Reply)
as is Peephole
I don't know names of songs on the other albums, but the one that goes "I buy my crack, my smack, my bitch right here in Hollywood" is a good one
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:00, Reply)
I'm striving for equality here
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:56, Reply)
and not as into each other as they'd have you believe. Next
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:01, Reply)
EDIT: What am I saying, I love Abba.
How about Pendulum.
Actually I quite like them too, I just wanted to hurt you.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:14, Reply)
if you hadn't revealed yourself to be right. Also, ABBA? Really? I didn't mind them until I was forced to sit through Mamma Mia *shudders*
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:30, Reply)
From Ringworld. Ok, it's not a film (as far as I know) but it should be.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:01, Reply)
I think that's what's made me so soft and naive, although I'm learning slowly. I imagine you can say that Manchester is my Ringworld.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:19, Reply)
Or just that it used to be civilised, but is now mostly populated by savages.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:09, Reply)
I watched that yesterday for the second time this week.
it is right up there among my favourite films
"you'd better square your ass away and start shitting me Tiffany cufflinks!"
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:03, Reply)
Did you recognise Jokers boss in nam? The guy who says "It's a giant shit sandwhich and we all have to take a bite"?
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:19, Reply)
I do not. edit: Holy shit, christian shepherd
I realised the other day that Animal Mother (the dude with the M60) is Jayne from Firefly
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:20, Reply)
I have no interest in science and am therefore completely opposite to Leonard off the Big Bang Theory
I maintain, though, that whisking ingredients, putting them in the oven for twenty minutes and retrieving a cake is MAGIC
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:08, Reply)
What a waste.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:13, Reply)
It underpins your entire life, the entire progress of the human race has been based on science ion one guise or another.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:16, Reply)
it's just so interesting. I've been watching Wonders of the Solar System, and while it is slightly watered down science for the masses, it is still thoroughly interesting and engaging.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:16, Reply)
Although was shit at it in school. I like to know how things work, and about new advancements in technology.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:19, Reply)
well, not biology. I seemed to have a natural aptitude for physics.
I love the mind-blowing stuff, like enormous ice-geysers on some of the more distant moons, or the repetition of patterns in various things shaped by natural processes.
technology is cool too, particularly now when a lot of very science fictiony stuff is being created.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:27, Reply)
Evolution of galaxies for one:
Old theory: eliptical galaxies eventually develop structure and form spiral galaxies, pretty patterns, rather nice idea that nature tends to something hige and amazing.
New theory: Elipical galaxies are formed when other galaxies smash into each other.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:14, Reply)
I have a natural tendency to be disinterested in anything I'm not good at. I was shit at science in school and deeply resent being made to take Physics and Chemistry GCSE. However, it would help if science wasn't so fucking boring
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:16, Reply)
"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree, you can fuck off."
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:18, Reply)
I thought you were better than that. What is a non-science guy like you doing in a science web like this?
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:24, Reply)
I'll forgive you if you say you like video games.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:36, Reply)
I can assure you it's possible to be geeky without knowing any science beyond the "fiction" part
The sexy bit is really for you to decide!
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:43, Reply)
sorry
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:01, Reply)
F*ck! Now I have it on my mind again! Your fault!
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:20, Reply)
;-)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:38, Reply)
"What a waste"
I knew you'd see the light eventually. "Wake Up And Make Love To Me" on the B-side was good too.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:23, Reply)
It can't so obviously science is a fallacy.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:08, Reply)
and if he bad mouths me again I'll spark him right out.. And his mate Stevie Hawkin
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:31, Reply)
why some people worship a carpenter who lived 2000 years ago
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:14, Reply)
Or short, B3ta-friendly answer?
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:22, Reply)
And I'm not going into the second one, because it would have been exaggerated beyond my own opinion for comedy effect and would have been offensive to my best B3ta-friend
Sorry
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:28, Reply)
just not keen on upsetting my friends
Yes, I know I need to try harder to fit in around here
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:36, Reply)
One of the major drawbacks to being an intelligent species is that, the more you learn, and the more you communicate with one another, the more questions you start to ask. I think it's fair to say that, despite the signs of intelligence shown by dolphins, chimpanzees, badgers and - most importantly - crows, we're the only species that has got as far as questioning its own existence - and indeed its own purpose.
So, whilst the natural philosophers of old trying their best to provide an explanation for why shit goes down the way it does, they have a tendency to go for wild postulations rather than experiment and observation. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes they get the right idea, and sometimes they just made shit up. And when life's most challenging questions are staring you in the face, eventually some people will start to speculate that there are gods controlling these things.
Arguments rage over whose gods are the right ones, and indeed whether it should be 'gods' or 'a god,' but in the absence of a better explanation, most people concede to the 'god' idea eventually.
Trouble is, people get attached to the cosy 'god' explanation, and the myths get wilder and wilder as they're passed down through generations. Life after death becomes a common theme, as does the idea of 'god' or 'the gods' wielding peculiar supernatural powers, and eventually 'choosing' people to perform tasks for them.
All this time, science is advancing. People slowly get used to the idea that you can discover an awful lot by simply looking at something in more detail, as opposed to just having a quick look and then dreaming up an explanation.
Unfortunately, even though it provides nice, sensible, rational explanations, people have trouble letting go of the other idea they've been bought up with - 'god.' It's lovely that we can now explain the motion of a solid object, the swing of a pendulum or the elasticity of a spring, but what's going to happen to me after I die? Nothing new? Oh well, I'll stick with my 'god/heaven' explanation then.
I think part of the problem, for most people, is the indoctrination that comes from such an early age. As soon as you're old enough to understand that people are born and will one day die, there's a priest there to tell you that you were a blessing from 'god' and if you're a good boy/girl then your 'soul' will fly up to 'heaven' when you die. Religion gets a headstart over science because this is much easier to explain to the juvenile mind than such process as sexual reproduction, genetics, illness and necrosis. So every generation starts its life with an older and wiser authority figure telling them the same set of myths that was passed down to them from an early age.
And of course, it provides an explanation which is initially easier to understand and much fluffier than the cold logic of science. You can see why people cling to it so fervently; some people are never shown how flatly it contradicts science and logic, and some people see it and try to find ways to reconcile the two, just because they fear that the cold, clinical cycle of being born, surviving, possibly reproducing and then dying only to rot, too much to bear.
If you need me, I'll be putting on my fire-proof jacket in anticipation of a fairly substantial flaming.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:00, Reply)
I was simply unprepared to start laying into Christians, against which I have nothing in particular, before actually having the religion discussion with my religious best B3ta-friend /end simpering excuse
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:04, Reply)
Just a bit pragmatic. Possibly a little patronising. And I didn't feel any need to pick on the christians specifically, even though it was christian priests prattling on at my juvenile self in my case.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:24, Reply)
Just 2 things:
The idea of god, originally, where does it come from? How is it that all this very uneducated people came with a concept as big as that?
Second, when I was a kid and knew nothing about genetics, I was told the story about the stork. Once I understood all the other things, I gave up that story as stupid. Maybe you still believe on it?
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:06, Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._F._Skinner#Superstition_in_the_pigeon
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:18, Reply)
is a good one. I can't actually tell you because I wasn't there when somebody came up with the idea. However, in a large, unexplored world, you can imagine how easy it would be to look at complicated and confusing as natural phenomena and suppose that perhaps the thunderstorm was caused by a monster that lives beyond the horizon, and you can see how ideas like that might develop into the idea of a big, bearded feller at the top of the sky who put everything together in the first place.
The second question - don't be daft, I was delivered by a crow! Joking aside, you give up the stork story because it can very easily be proven to be patently false. That, and your parents admit they were lying. Unfortunately, religion seems to endure because it has long had this habit of shrouding itself in mystical gibberish and hiding behind the (flimsy) excuse that 'science doesn't know everything.'
Science will accept the existence of 'god' when he/she/it can be detected, and not before. Religion claims that 'god' is beyond the limits of our perception or similar. Trouble is, this leaves them in a stalemate, where religion's only defence is its claim that science can't disprove the existence of 'god.' Anyone with a better understanding of logic, please feel free to pick that apart; personally I've resigned to the stance that even though science has no counterexample to logically disprove the existence of 'god' to the satisfaction of religion, common sense suggests that the enormous, gaping lack of evidence for 'god' is pretty damn convincing.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:20, Reply)
And I think I'd be agnostic if it wasn't for a few very deep experiences. But I realize that believing is not something that can be forced into someone.
I had a priest explaining me that faith is a blessing, and not everybody gets the same blessings. So, some people don't believe because God didn't want them to believe. It gets more and more complicated.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:24, Reply)
And, being typically cynical and a bit pragmatic about it, I'd say there's almost certainly a natural explanation for them. So you're right: believing is not something that can be forced into someone.
As for the faith/blessing explanation from that priest...I'm sorry if it meant a lot to you, but to me, that has all the hallmarks of the typical horse-shit I was just talking about.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:27, Reply)
The existence of some higher power beyond our perceptions is, by definition of it's properties ("beyond our perception"), impossible to prove. Therefore you have to have faith in it's existence, and faith that it is benevolent and caring.
I can not make that leap.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:26, Reply)
when god lived in a high mountain, it was easy to say so. Then when the people said "I've been up there and he isn't." the goal posts had to move. God then was in the sky. Well, someone looked through a telescope and couldn't see him. So god became invisble and now, outside of the universe.
The closer technology or man comes to god, the more ellusive god is.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:28, Reply)
Leading to the famous 'cogito ergo sum'. I don't agree with how he took this as a baseline to then go on to talk about the existence of a benevolent 'God', I stuck to the idea that everything apart from my own existence can be doubted.
However, that's not a way to live (solipsism or paranoia I guess), but I use it as an explanation for why I'm agnostic, and say that instead of following a religion, I follow my own morals, which essentially boil down to the 'do unto others' principal.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:12, Reply)
His way of thinking made sense but at the same time, it sounds a bit like a desperate way to try to find something real to stuck to it.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:15, Reply)
I'd worship a good one if he rebuilt my bathroom the way I want it.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:21, Reply)
with half a sardine and a mouldy loaf of bread, then jesus christ we'd have a winner..
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:32, Reply)
like Apple. They told me the iPad is magic. And quite frankly I believe them.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:07, Reply)
but something that does so much cannot be natural.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:14, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KttQ67ESf8M&feature=related
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:08, Reply)
Fo Sho. Even family call MrsP Hyacinth at times.
Although I'm more like Onslow than Richard.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:14, Reply)
college.cengage.com/english/kalaidjian/understanding_lit/1e/shared/images/arthur_marilyn.jpg
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:20, Reply)
And I love how they have someone so insanely hot to voice Meg in Family Guy.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:38, Reply)
I used to enjoy watching that 70s show. Donna from that was quite tasty too. for a ginge.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:39, Reply)
best ginge = bridget regan
even better when she was dyed her hair non-ginge
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:44, Reply)
I do have a mild obsession with Ms Regan it must be said. to the point where I'm going to watch every episode of the rather shit tv show she is in
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:47, Reply)
www.thechestnut.com/riddlers/tiddler.jpg
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:16, Reply)
Hi Roota, nice to meet you
*proffers desperate, sweaty hand*
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:23, Reply)
Or the most beautiful creature that ever drew breath.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:25, Reply)
Which is a start.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:28, Reply)
More men should put that on their dating profiles, 'I'm no Arthur Miller...'
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:30, Reply)
Unicorns are gorgeous but I wouldn't want to fuck one
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:30, Reply)
I could well picture you doing the fandango with a unicorn
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:33, Reply)
I could probably lead one into quite a dramatic Tango though
Yes I knew what you meant
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:37, Reply)
she's not the most beautiful creature who ever drew breath.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:30, Reply)
but you have to admit she had something amazing and undefinable.
And I refer more to candid shots that show her prettiness and gentleness rather than those vile tacky glanourous pictures.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:32, Reply)
and I know what you mean about the candid shots. I'm sure I had someone more beautiful in mind, but I'll be damned if I can remember who....
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:35, Reply)
man I'd turn gay for that in a second.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:47, Reply)
despite being thick as two short planks, I'd probably have to say that Kelly Brook is possibly the most gorgeous creature I've seen.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:53, Reply)
(slightly NSFW due to nipple)
www.la-star.com/p/pics/sophie-marceau/sophie-marceau-20070525-261103.jpg
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:59, Reply)
because Marilyn was lovely and Jordan's nasty
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:37, Reply)
Marilyn aimed for the top
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:41, Reply)
Even the fact that she went with other people's oosbands. Which is on top for sure.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:41, Reply)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:38, Reply)
Cos you've got pictures of Barack in his grundies all over your khazi
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:42, Reply)
For some reason getting close to him to take pictures is a lot more difficult than it used to be. He's changed, man *looks wistful*
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:45, Reply)
And I always run out of hotsauce.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:04, Reply)
looking for some hotsauce baby this evening, I need some hotsauce baby tonight
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:18, Reply)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:33, Reply)
Beards by definition can only ever be quite impressive unless you add some crazy shit, like one of those amazing curly moustaches or some pyrotechnics
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:40, Reply)
I'm trying to find some beads to go in it or something.
burning fuses perhaps
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:40, Reply)
But it's a metal festival...
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:46, Reply)
I'll probably be wearing a straw cowboy hat if it's sunny.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:48, Reply)
It'll give me a defence against the immediate accusations of bumdering
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:53, Reply)
Good point though, I can't expect to maintain my awesome hairstyle in a field. I need to think about which hats I own that are both quite cool and easily replaceable. Slayer are playing. No hat that goes into a Slayer Pit comes out alive
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:07, Reply)
definitely manly and straight
sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs160.snc1/5980_136149281888_754656888_2465071_609059_n.jpg
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:13, Reply)
The perfect position to judge people on anything ever, with or without justification
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:41, Reply)
although I do have traces of Susan in me, with the mishaps and clumsiness.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:39, Reply)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:40, Reply)
Oh, sorry, forgot you don't like science ;)
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:42, Reply)
Ozzy Osbourne album, 1997. First single was "Perry Mason"
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:47, Reply)
it's osmosis is only with water, you mean diffusion.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:49, Reply)
like how Tom is always trying to regain his youth by doing childish things and Lynette allows him to think he's winning at stuff when he's not.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:42, Reply)
He might have phenomenally potent spaff. You should bottle it or something in case there's a plague
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:48, Reply)
Just a hunch. If that's the case I'm going to adopt a black baby just to upset Wiggy's grandmother.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:49, Reply)
Me and my best friend - WHO'S A GIRL) - agreed when we were 20 that if we were both unmarried when we were 30 we'd hook up and have a bunch of kids. Then we turned 30 and I reminded her of this and that we were contractually bound to ditch our long-term partners and find a small chapel in Vegas. We extended it to 40.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:59, Reply)
This scares me. Stupid biological clock needs a snooze button.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:02, Reply)
My Mum had my sister when she was 35 with no problems at all
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:07, Reply)
I'm 25
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:19, Reply)
I still need to get my career on track once I've done my degree, plus I want to emigrate, I want to learn how to sail and dive and then buy a boat to do both those things on, all that in 10 years, plus have a decent enough amount of money saved up to be able to actually feed the kid, I just think I'll run out of time.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:50, Reply)
Do you want your career to be on a self-employed run-from-home basis? You can learnt to sail and dive once you're a Mum. I see what you mean but what you want most will take precedence eventually. You'll either deprioritise something for the sake of having a child or realise that all these other things are more important to you
I guess. I mean, what the fuck do I know?!
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 12:54, Reply)
I don't want to wait until after I've had kids to do all these things, I want to do them whilst I'm free and youthful.
My degree has 2 years or so left on it, it's a distance learning one so it's however long I take with it.
I still can't decide if I actually want a child or if it's just ingrained in me that that's what you do.
EDIT: Forgot the career question, it's interior design so I would be working for an office initially. Hopefully. Then maybe freelance, but not for a long time.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 13:06, Reply)
I say this is all guesswork on my part as I am devoid of ovaries, but I figure you'll work these things out as you go. I've had the decision made real easy for me by Ms Foxtrot sensibly deciding that my line should not be furthered.
Am guessing you're also studying with the OU. Am also guessing that by now you've since abandoned this thread
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 14:06, Reply)
"Me and Wiggy are Lynette and Tom Scavo from Desperate Housewives
although I do have traces of Susan in me, with the mishaps and clumsiness....DON'T YOU AGREE PSYCHOCHOMP?"
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:49, Reply)
I might make that my sig just for you.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:52, Reply)
Vile kitchen? Check.
Chronically unsuccessful love life? Check.
Enormous stash of pornography? Check.

(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:45, Reply)
So I read it without seeing your signature, and I thought it was BGB talking.
(, Tue 15 Jun 2010, 11:47, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »