Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
your life is not insignificant anymore. And on top of that, you don't know what repercusions your acts have on the future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:35, 3 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
There's what's significant to you, to people you know, to strangers, to the world, to the universe etc.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:36, Reply)
everyone you ever meet or know will die, every bit of information we ever record will burn and the universe won't even notice.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:36, Reply)
That's not the same as being insignificant. Your action might have triggered something that will make the future better. Maybe that person you helped recovered faith in humanity and started to work towards something that will be great. Your name will never be there, but if you hadn't helped that person, she/he wouldn't have done that great thing that improved our race.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:40, Reply)
or our galaxy crashes into another or any of our local stars go supernova. Then everyone dies, everything gets fried and there is literally no trace of what once was.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:42, Reply)
We might have found out how to control supernovas.
We might be all dead, but we might not. Whatever we do today will decide our future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:44, Reply)
We only need the knowledge and time.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:50, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:53, Reply)
Space-time travel is not explicitly forbidden by current physics. It's just that the energies required and the length scales involved are phenomenally large and incredibly small respectively.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:00, Reply)
and how many more laughed at them or "proved" it impossible.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:13, Reply)
If we can go faster than the speed of light, which isn't even mathmatically or theoretically possible at the moment, that's still a long time before we get there.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:54, Reply)
Andromeda is the nearest spiral at 2.5 million
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:01, Reply)
within the context of the human race one person's actions can be significant, but on the universal scale they aren't.
To bring it back to life after death, my view is that as we are such a small and insignificant part of the universe why would we be singled out for such a thing? unless it is a side-effect of consciousness, but then where do you draw the line. Would all animals be there? Just us, dolhpins and chimps and the like? How about aliens?
I certainly don't think that there can be an afterlife in the religious sense as that would imply that we are somehow special amongst the vastness of everything, and that is just massively egomaniacal.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:45, Reply)
You have to admit that we are somehow special. To start with, we're having this conversation. No other animal considers anything like this.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:51, Reply)
I'm a stoner don't forget ;-)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:54, Reply)
hands as well. good stuff.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:58, Reply)
and how they protect us, the more amazed I was that we were alive :)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:03, Reply)
Or dolphins?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:56, Reply)
even if you want to believe they have conciousness and they think about themselves as individuals, they don't modify their habitat to make their life easier, not in a big scale (I don't think they do it even in a small scale) and they act without considering what'll happen in the future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:04, Reply)
what we're getting at is that the human scale is totally insignificant when compared to the rest of the universe.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:37, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread