Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
Discuss.
And no getting into God.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:59, 219 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Why spend 70 odd years as a mortal and then an eternity floating around as something else?
Does everyone who ever lived get to float around in the ether? What about other animals? If not, what about Neandethals or Cromagnion (sp?) and other early forms of human.
Once I stopped believing in religious dogma, everything else seemed like nonsense as well.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:08, Reply)
The nothingness was surrounding me and eating me.
I finally had the answer, and I didn't want it.
I guess that's why we probably invented life after death, for our fragile egos.
In saying that, whenever I'm in trouble, I ask my deceased great-grandma to mind me, and she always does.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:03, Reply)
people can't grasp how insignificant they are.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:04, Reply)
I imagine you refer to other people, not yourself.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:06, Reply)
not to those who know and love me, but on a universal scale it would be massively conceited to think that any of us has any effect on anything.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:08, Reply)
Like Einstein (to name one) didn't have any effect on anything? Do you think his life would have been the same withouht the other insingnificant lifes around his? A little change and he might have not have done all what he did. A little change and he might have done more.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:11, Reply)
The vast majority of everyone who came before him.
Pretty much every other type of lifeform other than humans.
Intergalactic Space Dogs.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:14, Reply)
will help someone in the future to do it.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:22, Reply)
dinosaurs existed for a shitload longer than humanity has (and probably will) and we don't feel the affect of them, other than in museums and in the cinema.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:16, Reply)
and you don't know for how much longer humanity is going to be here (or somewhere else)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:23, Reply)
unless something unpredictable happens. Unfortunately the unpredictable is weighted heavily in favour of something happening that will fuck us over.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:25, Reply)
Dinosaurs were here a lot longer than us, however, they didn't achieve a tiny fraction of what we have. The reason we move forwards is a collective achievment. There are some bright heads and brave hearts that we remember more, but the environment were they grow up, the other insignificant people around them, made them what they were.
I don't think we're as fucked as some people want us to believe. I think we have time to change and improve things.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:33, Reply)
and contains an absurd number of galaxies and planets and whatnot. On that scale, the achievements of one man, or any of the people connected to him have no bearing on anything.
I'm not denying the importance of the actions of an individual on us as a species, but we are such a small part of the whole of everything.
Even if the entire history of mankind had been radically different it would still only have affected things basically on the surface (and slightly above) of one tiny planet in one solar system in one galaxy.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:15, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWVshkVF0SY
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:19, Reply)
As you don't know how we're changing the future of the universe.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:24, Reply)
that our actions simply can't be affecting it in any significant way.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:25, Reply)
You cannot know that. You can guess and assume that. But you'll never know (unless there's life after dead and we get to see the future, coming back to the thread)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:34, Reply)
but it's a far more likely assumption. If there is life after death and we see that that has happened, then I'll find you and buy (or equivalent) you a drink (or equivalent)!
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:40, Reply)
They don't grasp the idea of the internet or the universe but it's around them and in their lives.
What's around us that we don't have the brain capacity to understand or even see?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:42, Reply)
And I trully hope we get to understand everything after dead, even if it's only for a millisecond, I want everything to make sense.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:48, Reply)
I really hope that is what comes after death. I don't want another life, I want to be able to see and understand everything.
Have you read The Light of Other Days, by C. Clarke? That is so much my desired future!
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:48, Reply)
"Hey baby, ever realised how futile your existence is? Fancy sitting on my face?"
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:12, Reply)
I think we are incredibly insignificant but all think we're important. It's like when someone has one of those past life regressions done - always Cleopatra. Never, ever some toilet cleaner from Macclesfield.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:06, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:08, Reply)
I've told you, I'm not a toilet cleaner, the term is Sanitation Consultant.
But yes, I am in Macclesfield
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:13, Reply)
I'm actually quite ok with it, but then I find the idea of fate and pre-determinism ridiculous. I much prefer the thought that life on a whole is chaotic and random, with no proof to support a life-after-death theory.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:07, Reply)
then you can't believe at the same time that we are all insignificant, because every little thing we do, will have an effect in the future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:13, Reply)
But in the grand scope of the universe throughout time, these will have excruciatingly little significance (although I concede that they will have some, so not strictly insignificant).
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:15, Reply)
It could be that in the grand scope of the universe we'll be the greatest race ever, and we'll bring peace and technology to the whole of the space and time.
Unlikely, but you don't know. So your life is very important, because making the most of it, living it to the full and giving as much as you can, you make our race better.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:18, Reply)
I'm not going to piss my life away because I believe I have very little significance to the universe, I'm going to piss it away because it's fun and I'm not that clever.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:20, Reply)
they are all we have, so should enjoy them as much as possible (which I am attempting to do) but given the size of the universe and the probability, I can't believe that we are the only planet with intelligent life. I'm not saying I think we'll ever be contacted by it, because that is almost as unlikely as there not being any others, but I strongly doubt we'll be the greatest race ever.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:21, Reply)
I wonder what would have happened if the great people of the past had decided they didn't give a fuck and didn't fight for a better life, didn't keep on doing research... Our lifes would know be probably like those of the humans thousands of years ago.
Don't you wonder what we'll be able to do, given enough time, to the rest of the Universe? Don't you really believe we can be a great race?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:30, Reply)
Does not mean we advocate people do nothing. We just have this life, it'd be stupid not to make it the best it can be, for everyone.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:32, Reply)
your life is not insignificant anymore. And on top of that, you don't know what repercusions your acts have on the future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:35, Reply)
There's what's significant to you, to people you know, to strangers, to the world, to the universe etc.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:36, Reply)
everyone you ever meet or know will die, every bit of information we ever record will burn and the universe won't even notice.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:36, Reply)
That's not the same as being insignificant. Your action might have triggered something that will make the future better. Maybe that person you helped recovered faith in humanity and started to work towards something that will be great. Your name will never be there, but if you hadn't helped that person, she/he wouldn't have done that great thing that improved our race.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:40, Reply)
or our galaxy crashes into another or any of our local stars go supernova. Then everyone dies, everything gets fried and there is literally no trace of what once was.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:42, Reply)
We might have found out how to control supernovas.
We might be all dead, but we might not. Whatever we do today will decide our future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:44, Reply)
We only need the knowledge and time.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:50, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:53, Reply)
Space-time travel is not explicitly forbidden by current physics. It's just that the energies required and the length scales involved are phenomenally large and incredibly small respectively.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:00, Reply)
and how many more laughed at them or "proved" it impossible.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:13, Reply)
If we can go faster than the speed of light, which isn't even mathmatically or theoretically possible at the moment, that's still a long time before we get there.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:54, Reply)
Andromeda is the nearest spiral at 2.5 million
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:01, Reply)
within the context of the human race one person's actions can be significant, but on the universal scale they aren't.
To bring it back to life after death, my view is that as we are such a small and insignificant part of the universe why would we be singled out for such a thing? unless it is a side-effect of consciousness, but then where do you draw the line. Would all animals be there? Just us, dolhpins and chimps and the like? How about aliens?
I certainly don't think that there can be an afterlife in the religious sense as that would imply that we are somehow special amongst the vastness of everything, and that is just massively egomaniacal.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:45, Reply)
You have to admit that we are somehow special. To start with, we're having this conversation. No other animal considers anything like this.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:51, Reply)
I'm a stoner don't forget ;-)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:54, Reply)
hands as well. good stuff.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:58, Reply)
and how they protect us, the more amazed I was that we were alive :)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:03, Reply)
Or dolphins?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:56, Reply)
even if you want to believe they have conciousness and they think about themselves as individuals, they don't modify their habitat to make their life easier, not in a big scale (I don't think they do it even in a small scale) and they act without considering what'll happen in the future.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:04, Reply)
what we're getting at is that the human scale is totally insignificant when compared to the rest of the universe.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:37, Reply)
I don't believe people should stop striving to better themselves or our civilisation, because we have to make the most of what we have and to try and perpetuate ourselves and so forth, but I also don't harbour any doubts that beyond our small sphere of influence we will have no impact.
I absolutely think that we could achieve amazing things, but only when measured at an appropriate scale.
When viewed against the sheer enormity of the rest of everything it's my opinion that trying to think we matter is absurd.
Fortunately it is also irrelevant, so there isn't really any point in thinking about it, other than as an interesting philosophical exercise.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:34, Reply)
(although you lost me with a few fancy words, up there)
Give us a couple of billions of years and we might have expanded through half of the universe.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:37, Reply)
and I'm totally in support of it. I'm just not holding my breath in anticipation ;-)
thoroughly enjoying the discussion. which words lost you?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:39, Reply)
a) being called a freak/nerd
b) getting the other person upset and shouting at me :)
I'm not holding my breath either, but I really hope so. And I really believe that our acts today will have an effect on the future, somehow. Sometimes a big effect, sometimes just something small, but they do.
Striving and harbour, but I think I got the general meaning.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:43, Reply)
it's why I studied civil engineering....
I was saying to my mrs the other day that I really miss this sort of discussion, it's the sort of thing I used to do with mates at uni and stuff all day/night, and these days I only really get it on here.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:47, Reply)
I like to kick off debates about fate vs free will, and just watch people talk, chipping in here and there with counter arguments to keep things flowing.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:51, Reply)
We had compulsory Phylosophy at school for 2 years (17 and 18 years old). I wanted to be an engineer, so I didn't study it any longer, but kept reading some good books.
Those 2 years we'd spend the day on the beach, singing and discussing about life and humanity. Great times.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:53, Reply)
I don't tend to get upset, unless someone is being absolutely wrong and won't accept it. In this sort of discussion it's hard to be dead wrong.
striving = working towards
harbour = have
:-)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:47, Reply)
I had the meaning right!
Yep, and if someone gets upset I can just switch this thing off.
My friends were all a bit close minded, but I loved so much to make them think different, even if I wasn't really sure of what I was saying :P
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:55, Reply)
that's true
I don't tend to argue anyway. Been with my mrs for 6 years and we've never argued, we've had disagreements, but not what I'd call an argument.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:57, Reply)
My girlfriend likes to win such discussions, even when there can't be a 'winner'.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:58, Reply)
I'd had a number of beers and jagers and spliffs and came to the conclusion that it's a result of being too laid back and too right :-D
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:00, Reply)
I don't argue about these things, as nobody can win. I get upset about more material things, I'm affraid.
I used to discuss with that crazy poet boyfriend I had (the one that stopped the cars) because he was far too pesimist without a reason.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:07, Reply)
and it works. It might be my mind playing tricks, but it works, so I'll keep doing it.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:07, Reply)
You have some intense dreams. That said I had one the other night where I gradually went blind, I think it was because of an interview with Sue Townsend I'd read.
I think the invention of an afterlife is to do with the uncertainty and apparent pointlessness in life, people like to think there's a plan and a goal. But I think it's also worthwhile recognising that if it is largely pointless then you shouldn't take things too seriously, try and enjoy it and 'fart-about' as Vonnegut put it.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:22, Reply)
Just face it Monty. We like you and there is nothing you can do about it.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:17, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:19, Reply)
If there is no "God" or any superior being who's made us; if we're just a coincidence, then quite certainly, there isn't life after death.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:05, Reply)
has ever been provided for such an idea - which in itself seems so enormously improbable to me I discount it without more than a moment's thought.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:06, Reply)
There is no other logical explanation.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:06, Reply)
I think the idea of going through mortal bodies until you get it right is a good one. I'll ignore the fact that it's implausible, I just want to come back as a panther.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:09, Reply)
Unfortunately logic dictates that I cannot.
I studied Buddhism, and apparently the worst thing to come back as, is an anvil.
a) what?
b) way to keep up with the modern world you spastics.
Ignoring the obviously-bollocks reincarnation thing Buddhism is a decent philosophical system, I thought.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:14, Reply)
because it just makes sense. However, it stipulates not eating meat and not putting any toxins into your body, so that's me out. It's the only religion that comes close to just being a normal moral compass though. I wanted to read the Buddhist scriptures until I realised there were like 30,000 of them.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:16, Reply)
Something that seems to me to be at the base of most religions. The 'Do unto others' thought.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:19, Reply)
/non-materialistic hippy
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:35, Reply)
That we're no different to any other life form - cells, molecules and all that stuff. All of them change over time - nothing disappears as such but simply changes state. So it makes sense that when we die we change state - rot. Or burn. Either way, that's it in the same way that it is for a rose or a leaf.
However, what about the stuff we can't quantify? Our thoughts and brain activity? It's electrical impulses (I'm on dodgy ground here as I'm no scientist) but where does that energy go? All the other stuff gets converted but what about the stuff we can't see?
I can't see electricity but I know it's there.
I'm sure there is a rational explanation for this - I certainly don't think there is some afterlife - as nice as that might be I think this is it and once it's done, it's done.
But still...where does all that energy in our heads go?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:12, Reply)
but the complexities of that energy...all that it's capable of...and just turned into heat?
Isn't that also suspiciously close to some primitive religions that worship the sun?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:17, Reply)
My argument is three-fold:
There is proof the Sun exists.
The Sun's existence is beneficial to us.
I like ice lollies.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:23, Reply)
the Sun is the most important thing we've got, let's worship it
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:30, Reply)
is just energy condensed to a slow vabration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:17, Reply)
Another four converts.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:24, Reply)
I like the bits of Hicks I've seen but I wouldn't have known the name of the DVD. Intelligent but cynical man and sometimes too many US references for me.
I'll
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:37, Reply)
I don't like to band that word about too often but he was a brilliant man.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:35, Reply)
and likened it to being unconscious, which really stuck with me because he/she was right, when you're unconscious you don't feel anything and you have no memory of it when you wake up, so it's probably like that.
But I still want to come back as a panther.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:18, Reply)
Which is a slightly surreal comedy film
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:46, Reply)
It's part of my bubble world, it's great in there, sometimes it gets popped, it's not based on any logic outside of my head. In my dreams I can contact those people, sometimes.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:16, Reply)
So I recon there must be something true there, 'cus it's to much of a coincidance that they _all_ say similar things, but haven't known each other.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:18, Reply)
Our genetic ancestry can be traced back to one valey in africa.
Plus the other way of thinking about things like that is that we're genetically predisposed to think about life after death, not that we thought of it of totally free will.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:20, Reply)
It's not so implausable, think of a queen bee that releases fairomones when they die, 100 or 200 years ago, such things were unexplainable, in 100 years who knows what we'll explain about what we don't know today.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:24, Reply)
evolutionary psychologists think it's an intergral part of society and so it was an advantage early in our history. Honestly we don't know yet, if it's even true let alone what the causes are.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:43, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:52, Reply)
Life after death? Unless you're on Lost then yeah, its kinda shit
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:19, Reply)
But if I'm not witnessing the gradual erosion of the memory of me, then why should I care?
I should just have the loveliest time I can, and spend my time here with the bestest people I can find.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:21, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:27, Reply)
Either you've just complemented me, or you've seriously insulted yourself.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:28, Reply)
then you're truly dead.
Just a little bit of light philosophy there, folks.
Hoping I can get away with it as Enzyme isn't about....
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:31, Reply)
Which is why I'm currently keeping alive stories and memories of people who died before I was born, and my cousins have no recollection of. I don't want them to fade away and not matter.
Like my grandad's uncle who always wore a white silk scarf and dragged a fish on a string to attract cats.
Or the lady whose pearls I'm wearing today, who once got felt up in a motor-car by a young Laurence Olivier.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:34, Reply)
I'm just going to keep telling the stories until I die, and maybe someone will occasionally tell them after I die. And then I've messed things up, and these insignificant people will still be 'alive' long after people usually 'die'.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:42, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:44, Reply)
As long as I don't have consciousness I don't care what happens to me.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:22, Reply)
So that's sorted.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:25, Reply)
accidentally sums it up. I hate the thought that I could die tomorrow, and there simply be nothing left of anything that I was
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:27, Reply)
I really don't want to die.
i don't want anybody to have to miss me. And I dont want to go somewhere (or Nowhere) where I can't see the people I love.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:30, Reply)
I fear pain more than death.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:32, Reply)
From an evolutionary standpoint, the point of everything is to continue the species. Eat, sleep, breed. That's it.
People have just ended up with a sense of self. Which is how, sadly, even a successful species can evolve to make Bono and Chris Martin...
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:30, Reply)
Life isn't building up to something.
THIS IS IT.
This is what matters.
Go do something that makes you feel good.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:59, Reply)
Basically, given that there is a better than zero chance of intelligent life in the universe, and that there is a better than zero chance of that life becoming technological, chances are that sooner or later said life will reach a state where they can run simulations containing intelligent life which cannot be distinguished (from the inside) from reality. In this case, (and assuming that such simulations don't require, say, all the matter in the universe being turned into one giant computer to run them) it's infinitely more likely that you live in a simulation than in the real universe. So maybe you'll live your life over and over again until you get it right. Maybe you're the only real person in existence and everything else is just testing you to see how you'll behave. Maybe, as in the book, once a certain percentage of the universe realises you're probably in a simulation then you'll all move on to the next level.
/geekout
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:46, Reply)
Thank you.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:48, Reply)
and arguably Dark City / Exiztenz.
(I wrote my dissertation on how sci-fi films explore what we perceive as reality)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:54, Reply)
And then, on the final read through, moments before handing it in, I thought "Damn, this is shit!". Panicked for a month, then got the mark. I'd scored very highly, which made up for ballsing up my Sartre exam.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:05, Reply)
Then ballsed up my 'exam'. :(
I always mention the 1st in my CV though...
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:36, Reply)
Well, I did in my interview anyway, so I guess that counts.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:37, Reply)
but it was to do with snap-shot photographs and the idea of truth.
Merlot-Ponty FTW!
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:00, Reply)
It was awful and got a dreadful mark, but it was fucking brilliant too.
It was based on that childish concept of 'We'll never know if we're perceiving things in the same way or not. Not evena a straight line.'
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:02, Reply)
Phenomenology - my version of the colour green might be your version of blue.
Fascinating stuff - Merlot-Ponty and Sartre argued about it for years.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:06, Reply)
I've never successfully discussed it with anyone
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:07, Reply)
Other than to maybe go into a 'social contract' thing about agreed-upon notions of what is green/blue etc.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:14, Reply)
how can you get across to someone how you perceive a colour?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:18, Reply)
why some people are good at matching colours and others aren't. At least, that's what I like to believe, as it's a good excuse for a girl like me who always seems to put together the wrong clothes.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:20, Reply)
The only essay that I didn't hurriedly scribble together at 6am on deadline day.
53%
SAD
FACE
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:07, Reply)
I think I tought about that thing of the colours without anyone telling me, and I was so proud of myself. Until I realize there was a whole science behind it :(
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:16, Reply)
so it's not really relevant here.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:03, Reply)
I think you'll agree that I am clearly the authority here.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:05, Reply)
My first was about historical accuracy in the book, 'Gone with the Wind' and my third was a poetic-prose novella about a stalker.
So I'm covering all bases.
Mad women? I'm your expert.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:08, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:13, Reply)
The ancient greeks believed that a man's soul was immmortal, only so long as his friends remembered him.
I like to think this is true, which is why I'm thinking of my friend now, before we cremate him on Friday. He introduced me to drugs, what more can I say, a real star.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:48, Reply)
'Those dead who have not been able to be saved and transported to the boundaries of the concrete past of a survivor are not past; they along with their pasts are annihilated' p.112, Being and Nothingness, J-P S.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:04, Reply)
It's HUGE, and was a cunt to read, and made me hate Sartre.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:10, Reply)
Just wish it wasn't written in obscure/complex English. The translated works of Socrates/Plato are just as fruitful for interesting ideas, but far easier to read.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:39, Reply)
Ah...happy days.
EDIT - You did a philosophy degree, didn't you?
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:47, Reply)
And I used the allegory of the cave in my dissertation (when talking about The Matrix, how once Neo has seen outside the cave he is unable to return to it).
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:49, Reply)
so long as there are records of our acheivements, somehow we will last forever. We don't necessarily know the names of the people who built the pyramids, but they exist and are clearly man made, so their acheivements still stand and have impact on us today.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:13, Reply)
Just as there's no proof that you didn't die a millisecond ago and that this is the afterlife, with all memories imagined. Which makes no sense. Just like all theories about the afterlife. They make your head hurt unless you choose to believe one outright.
There's an interesting theory that when you die your brain acts as if it's on an ever-increasing dose of LSD, and that time slows down in inverse proportion to the time left until actual death, and suddenly you are effectively immortal, while at the same time dying very quickly. Which doesn't really make sense but fuck it.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 13:01, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »