Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
However, there are ways and means - entirely legal - which ensure that you do all the work but own nothing. Add to that various shenanigans which lead to writing off any profit against new 'necessary' purchases.
In theory it is possible to take him to the cleaners but in practice if everything is owned by your parents and not you or your new partner then it's half of fuck all.
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 14:54, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Tesco heiress but 'unable to pay her fine'...? Fucking bollocks.
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 14:59, Reply)
If you're rich you can get out of most things because it's in the best interests of your accountants, solicitors and all the other bastards to keep you rich.
Cunting bastards.
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 15:01, Reply)
They can claim 100% of the first £50,000 spent on large capital items. So all they have to do is buy a tractor (probably on 0% finance) and bye-bye profits.
My client has to account for EVERYTHING he spends, just to prove to the CSA that he doesn't have undisclosed income.
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 15:06, Reply)
And then it comes down to my word against his.
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 15:08, Reply)
If he cohabits with a new partner, the CSA should take her income into account when it comes to his child support payments, but they wont take into account the income of your new partner.
However, all my knowledge of such things is based on my 1 client who is going through the CSA mangle.
Good luck.
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 15:16, Reply)
I need to nag the CSA again anyway - they promised a criminal investigation about a year ago and I've heard nothing ever since about it.
To be honest I think the only way I can do anything is through them - I can't afford to go through expensive and lengthy litigation costs and he knows it.
Royally screwed I think is the term.
Avoid farmers, kids!
(, Wed 25 Aug 2010, 15:20, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread