b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 848654 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread


I bought their greatest hits convinced that I loved Ash. I very quickly realised they were gash. Although 'Candy' is still brilliant.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:09, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
they did a good version of the Star Wars Cantina music

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:10, Reply)
Must google this.

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:11, Reply)
B side on the girl from mars single if I remember right

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:16, Reply)
'Candy'
elevated Ash from a status of "band I can't be arsed with" to "band who really get right up my fucking nose"

And sullied a perfectly good Scott Walker recording.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:12, Reply)
I've never heard of them. Should I be grateful?

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:17, Reply)
Ash?
they're mediocre. A bit like Feeder.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:18, Reply)
I know OF Feeder, but I don't know anything by them.

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:22, Reply)
they started off ok and got steadily worse after they got big.
best stuff they did was instrumental tracks for one of the Gran Turismo games
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:24, Reply)
Not worth a look then?

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:24, Reply)
nope

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:27, Reply)
Cheers.

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:29, Reply)
yeah massively average band late 90's early millenium.

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:19, Reply)
"Average" really is the right word.
Also "feeble", "weak" or "wet." Like a bunch of kids desperately trying to "rock*" and just sounding a bit pathetic.

*Whatever the fuck that means, the way MTV go on about it you'd think there was a dictionary definition...
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:21, Reply)
I just looked them up.
The lead singer looks like a guy I had a fling with a while ago.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:24, Reply)
the singer from my band used to know him
as my mate's cousins lived down the road from him.

exciting stuff eh?
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:26, Reply)
Thrilling!
They sound utterly shit though, I only got about 30seconds into Candy before I gave up.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:27, Reply)
they're just bland
but had some wild reputation for a bit for some reason.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:29, Reply)
Their Wiki page classes them as Grunge.
That made me do an ANGRYFACE, after hearing Candy.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:30, Reply)
they are not grunge
pop-rock at most
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:31, Reply)
Bland, mediocre, radio-friendly pop with electric guitars
No edge, no real flavour to their music, and yet they seem to be hugely popular.

The Carling of popular music, if you will.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:34, Reply)
good summary

(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:36, Reply)
As a general rule
I don't like stuff that is classed as popular. But not BECAUSE it's classed as popular, just because I have far better taste than the general public.
So that makes sense.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:36, Reply)
Quite
Being popular doesn't mean it's bad by default, it's just the public have a phenomenal tendency to be WRONG.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:38, Reply)
Especially when the general public my age
Made up of half chav and common and half emo/indie/look at me I'm so kooky and unique.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:43, Reply)
This is precisely why they can't be trusted
Unreliable twatbags to a man.
(, Thu 2 Sep 2010, 14:47, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1