Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I tend to use volume. Yes, it's inaccurate, and weight is more accurate, but that's assuming my scales are accurate, and they aren't. Then again, I tend to make dough with rough amounts and then add extra until it kneads right. When I use a breadmaker as long as you are roughly accurate it doesn't seem to matter
and I'll be buying chandeliers, playing hockey and drinking booze.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:31, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I didn't want to think that gormless twat was right about anything.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:33, Reply)
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:36, Reply)
but Blaireau said that it wasn't accurate enough and made his loaves sloppy. Personally I think it was more because he was permanently sozzled while trying to use it.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:38, Reply)
or the volume reading won't correspond to the correct quantity of water. It's the mass of water which is important, but because it's a liquid it's more convenient to measure it in terms of volume.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:42, Reply)
is totally insignificant. And you know it.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:45, Reply)
This is the case.
But a kitchen scale is pretty inaccurate too, usually with a resolution of only 5g. So if you need say 25ml of water, you can easily get an error of 20%. A measuring spoon will beat that hands down.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:49, Reply)
It's effectively a colloid suspension of flour in water, so it's the size not the number of molecules that affect the consistency, which is what affects how the loaf cooks
/feels science dirty.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:51, Reply)
in the overall volume that gives you the consistency.
/Edit, strictly it's a effect of the release of starch which generates partial non-newtonian behaviour in the dough under kneading, so strictly it's a relationship between the amount of starch present in volumetric space. Water molecules have limited impact on the whole thing except to contribute "shape" through H-bonding, it's the branched long C-chains of starch "catching" on each other like little bits of velcro that give you the dough.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:55, Reply)
is a small fraction of the volume of the dough. It's hardly a colloidal suspension in the usual sense.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:57, Reply)
but the number of water molecules is irrelevant, only the "space" they create for the dough to occupy. See edit above. This is also getting far too serious ;)
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 13:02, Reply)
Much clearer now!
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 13:05, Reply)
Adding more flour "till it kneads right" sounds horrific.
When you make a cake, do you add more flour till it mixes right?
Hmm.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:43, Reply)
because in a cake you are balancing the ratios of more than two things. Bread is flour, yeast and water, and if you're using live yeast, you have a massive tolerance in the amount in there. Salt, yeah, but that's got a degree of tolerance too.
Adding more flour/water until the texture is OK simply affects the amount of bread you end up with.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 12:48, Reply)
It affects texture, consistency and how fast it bakes...
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 13:03, Reply)
that's affected solely by the ratio of starch to water, how good your yeast is and how big the loaf is. Since flours vary in starch content, by a country mile the best way to get consistent loaves is to make consistent dough texture. weighing ingredients only works if you always use the same batch of the same flour and that's not practical in a domestic kitchen.
If I end up with too much dough then I make more loaves. I don't just bake all the dough as one random loaf, obviously that would fuck things up.
(, Fri 10 Sep 2010, 13:55, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread