data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
I know I have produced no evidence, I thought you had read The selfish Gene, and such books. Maybe you should.
I put Know in quotes, I know they don't have a brain. See above.
See above. I understood that proper scientists and medical people have done research which shows that having sex with a sibling can lead to higher risk of deformities.
As for bonobos they do have sex as a form of greeting and generally communicate by shagging. This is well known, and has been on BBC2 and channel 5.
Now, I'm off out. Stop being a thicky, it suits you not.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:38, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
So what? Unless you think that we're obliged to have the healthiest possible children - in which case, just about all sex is wrong when IVF could be used to screen embryos - it's neither here nor there. Almost all children will lead a worthwhile life.
And, as I said before, the question here is in respect to sex, not procreation, so you're shifting the debate anyway.
As for the bonobos - yes: they have sex for all kinds of reasons. So do humans. I can't see why you think this important.
This isn't me being thick: it's just me refusing to give in to the yuck-reaction, which seems to be all you have.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:44, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:49, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
But that's because I don't think it has any moral value whatsoever; nor does it indicate anything that does. So when it comes to moral debates, if all you've got is the yuck reaction, you ain't got much.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:03, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
having not really woken up properly yet, but now I see where you are coming from.
I'm not one for moral judgements, and can fully state my reaction to the news was entirely "ewww", but then that wouldn't be much different from my reaction to anyone shagging Bert.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:10, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread