Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
but Hendrix doesn't make sense to my ears.
At any rate it's worse to not find stuff to talk about with your hero than it is to not like Hendrix
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 9:12, Reply)
my eyes didn't see the Adam bit. I just assumed you hadn't picked anyone. Sorry to hear that.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 9:15, Reply)
that is overshadowed by his onstage pyrotechnics and technical flash - it's not all demented wailing, magnificent though that was. It's worth trying an LP like 'Axis: Bold as Love' to get an idea of the subtlety and sensitivity of the words and music - if all he did was 'Voodoo Child: Slight Return' he'd still be the greatest musician of all time in my eyes, but that's only the tip of a complex, fragile and astoundingly beautiful iceberg.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 9:20, Reply)
to some boy or girl band that are in the charts? are you going to go spastic at her as well? it's only music Monty.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 9:34, Reply)
Nothing could be further from my feelings on the subject. I saw a fascinating documentary about scientific research into the body's responses to music - they really don't understand the emotional and physical reactions to organised sounds at all. The thinking is that understanding how it works could be key to understanding a huge amount more about how we function as humans.
From primitive tribal societies to the modern first world, music is a vital and massively important part of human culture and has been for as long as we've been around.
'It's only music' is a fatuous and demonstrably cretinous assertion.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 9:43, Reply)
How you respond to that noise is personal. I am not saying it's not important but you build it up to be some sort of spiritual thing and it just isn't. Well it probably is for you when you're smashed off your tits dancing around in your pants to whatever cacophony of crap you're currently championing. It doesn't matter, nothing matters.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 9:54, Reply)
We hear sound all day long - but particular combinations of sounds elicit real physical and emotional responses. This is scientific fact. Of course some people will have stronger reactions than others, in the same way that some people eat merely to live, whereas others take great joy from the food they eat.
Personally, I believe an appreciation of such things as good food, music etc. to be a key marker of civilisation. You're being an oaf and you know it.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 10:04, Reply)
I just don't get upset when people don't like what I like or understand why I like it. I even agree with you about Bowie a bit. For all his songs I love there are 5 or so more that are shit. Hendrix does nothing for me at all and I find his music a bit dull but it doesn't mean I don't understand why people regard him as one of the greats. You're being stubborn and you know it.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 10:10, Reply)
is that we spend nine months surrounded by our mum's heartbeat, so we become acclimatised to and comforted by rhythmic sounds. I would love to know how artificially gestated babies would differ from us if we just took away that one simple thing.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 10:11, Reply)
Not like Bobblehead here, or the type of person who only likes what's on the radio at the moment, but people who, as a whole, felt no affinity or need for the stuff, and would never individually come up with the idea? What else would this affect? Language acquisition? Physical skills (sense of rhythm reqd)?
Obviously, our love of music is not as simple as 'mum's heartbeat', but it's an interesting thought, because, as you said above, our biological relationship with music is extremely complex.
(, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 10:21, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread