he's arguing supervision rather than teaching
as presumably others on the course achieved better results making the teaching argument flawed. But poor personal supervision could only be used as an argument if he could prove his tutor had ignored a personal issue such as health or welfare, which affected his performance.

If he could have proved that, he would have succeeded in internal appeal at the Uni. Assuming he has appealed internally, of course, because if not, that means he doesn't actually want a higher grade but just wants money, which would make him even more of an utter cunt.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 14:52, 1 reply, 15 years ago)

The most important point you raise with this
is that, whichever way you spin it, however hard you try to argue it from his perspective, the guy comes across as an utter cunt.
(LongJohnBaldry, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 14:56, Reply)

true.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Sep 2010, 14:59, Reply)