Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Sorry
Educate me. What is 'rap', what is 'the hip and the hop'?
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:25, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
Hip hop is the musical style and overall culture. Hence there is such a thing as instrumental hip hop, and such things as 'rappers'.
Hip hop culture has five main disciplines- rapping, DJing, producing, graffiti and breaking. All distinct threads of the same culture.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:28, Reply)
The most important musical movement since jazz in the 20s though.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:31, Reply)
Not to mention the vast range of styles across hip hop as a whole, and the peculiarities of the genre- record collecting as an art in itself and the reconstruction of said records into discrete consumer items.
It's a fascinating semiotic language all of its own that only came into being through a reaction to the constraints imposed by poverty.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:36, Reply)
or a dictator of social mores amongst a section of society is the question
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:42, Reply)
You don't think rap has had a profound impact on how some parts of society have evolved recently? Indeed is not so much shaped (though in the past it was) as shaping now
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:55, Reply)
And I think it's cowardly and ignorant in the extreme to blame societal ills on musical styles.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:59, Reply)
of society's ills on it! I would rather think it cowardly not to see the bad side of music, however much I love it. You may with excellent reason adore your proper rap/hiphop, but don't tell me that the majority of stuff fetishised by people who listen to it is comprised of excellent tunes. It's not a separate genre.
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:06, Reply)
Just because twats listen to certain music, it's not the music that's to blame for them being twats.
I blame entrenched poverty etc.
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:10, Reply)
was whether the forms of rap/hiphop listened to, has a negative effect. You don't think so, I do, we'll have to agree to disagree
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:12, Reply)
incorporates a lot of topics. I could be biased of course since most generic rap/hiphop is horrifically and persistently sexist and homophobic
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:15, Reply)
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:20, Reply)
which is yeah sure if I investigated it properly it isn't. However whatever I hear of it blaring from chavvy houses, mobile phones and occasionally the radio IS. You know- the stuff people are actually listening to
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:22, Reply)
There is a world of difference between quality hip hop and the pop shit like 50 Cent and Eminem.
And of course it is social commentary- all worthwhile art serves that function.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:42, Reply)
to a massive extent. You have some biographic films about the genre, but it so very little conducive to mood or atmosphere that you rarely hear it used to any effect
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:43, Reply)
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:46, Reply)
that that technique is somehow the preserve of hiphop, might as well say Shakespeare's mixing of sources is the original sampling
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:54, Reply)
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:54, Reply)
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:37, Reply)
*Goes away to invent bed-post proof chewing gum*
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:15, Reply)
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:31, Reply)
When this is done well (DJ Shadow, RJD2, Flying Lotus) it is a wonderful thing that no other genre can do. When it is done badly (Will Smith, Black Eyed Peas, Run DMC) it is horrible to behold.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:38, Reply)
A good thief is better than a bad one.
Fair enough.
But why isn't the music produced original?
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:41, Reply)
Every chord has been played thousands of times, so why is playing, say, a G chord with a guitar any different to playing a G chord with a sampler? It's just a different instrument. And you can have juxtapositions with samples that add to the music thematically and at a structural level.
Why can a turntable or sampler not be considered a 'proper' musical instrument?
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:44, Reply)
But unless the actually play the chord themselves, rather than using someone elses' skill, they've 'borrowed' it.
(You have to keep in mind, I don't know the genre, I'm wonder how it works)
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:47, Reply)
Anyway, even if it was, every single popular genre to a certain extent is repetitious.
So what about The Roots? They are live hip hop. It just sounds like samples. Check the clip from La Haine with Sounds of Da Police for what hip hop (and other sample based musics) can do that other genres can't.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:51, Reply)
In Bristol, and, to a point, they've entertained.
But the world of fast-cars, expensive jewelery, guns and bitches seems somewhat removed from the commentary it professes to represent.
Or is this just the 'popular' stuff?
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:55, Reply)
Judging the whole genre by that is like judging heavy metal by Bon Jovi, or punk rock by Green Day.
Totally unrepresentative of what the real, good stuff is actually like.
And the Freestylers are breakbeat anyway.
To reiterate- the guns n' bling stuff is not representative of the genre as a whole.
(, Wed 13 Oct 2010, 23:58, Reply)
Can you post/gaz me some links to stuff that is 'genuine' for me to listen to tomorrow?
I've listened (and not understood) Raggamuffin stuff in the past, such as Tenor Fly (and enjoyed it to a point, despite not being able to understand a word of it), but a proper introduction to
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:01, Reply)
KRS-One, Tribe Called Quest, Cannibal Ox, Mos Def.
Just for starters.
Just go on youtube.
(, Thu 14 Oct 2010, 0:03, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread