Question of the Week suggestions
Each week we ask a question. The idea is to generate material that's:
* interesting to read, i.e. we won't get bored of reading the answers after about 10 of them
* not been asked on this site before
* fun to answer
What would you like to ask? (We've left this question open - so feel free to drop in ideas anytime.)
( , Wed 14 Jan 2004, 13:01)
Each week we ask a question. The idea is to generate material that's:
* interesting to read, i.e. we won't get bored of reading the answers after about 10 of them
* not been asked on this site before
* fun to answer
What would you like to ask? (We've left this question open - so feel free to drop in ideas anytime.)
( , Wed 14 Jan 2004, 13:01)
« Go Back
Unwarranted Self-Importance
Following on from this response to the great List Of QOW Failure, what's the best example of people taking themselves waay too seriously?
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:01, 8 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Following on from this response to the great List Of QOW Failure, what's the best example of people taking themselves waay too seriously?
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:01, 8 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Erm...
Does the fact that you sat down and made the list, and thought people would care about your opinion, have just a hint of irony?
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 15:24, Reply)
Does the fact that you sat down and made the list, and thought people would care about your opinion, have just a hint of irony?
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 15:24, Reply)
Oh, this again....
Do you not think the fact that you're mocking other posters on there for being self-appointed internet policemen and attention seekers is a tad ironic?
Besides, it's been in the newsletter now. Isn't that enough attention? Can you not just drop it?
( , Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:32, Reply)
Do you not think the fact that you're mocking other posters on there for being self-appointed internet policemen and attention seekers is a tad ironic?
Besides, it's been in the newsletter now. Isn't that enough attention? Can you not just drop it?
( , Mon 2 Nov 2009, 13:32, Reply)
« Go Back