Shit Stories: Part Number Two
As a regular service to our readers, we've been re-opening old questions.
Once again, we want to hear your stories of shit, poo and number twos. Go on - be filthier than last time.
( , Thu 27 Mar 2008, 14:57)
As a regular service to our readers, we've been re-opening old questions.
Once again, we want to hear your stories of shit, poo and number twos. Go on - be filthier than last time.
( , Thu 27 Mar 2008, 14:57)
« Go Back
There's an irregular poster on here...
who does nothing BUT post shit stories...
Unfortunately, they are literally just shit stories, not actually comical (or even vaguely humorous) tales about shit. And his responses to answers usually consist of his telling somebody that they are a cunt, mostly without constructing a decent argument or providing evidence that demonstrates his point of view. Or, if there is an argument provided, it's generally badly constructed and written as if English is his third language.
Everyone has their own opinions about what is and isn't funny/well written/thought provoking, and I certainly ain't knocking that freedom to choose what someone likes or doesn't like. You don't like someone's stuff - fine, put them on ignore; and if you have something to say to them then say it, as long as it is thought through and you can actually provide a well constructed argument. But don't resort to idle name calling and abuse because (a) it really shouldn't upset you so much, and (b) the chances are that you don't know what that person is really like.
Each to their own I suppose, but I'm certain the rules of the various boards state that if users don't like something, then they should just ignore the post/poster, rather than direct ignorant vitriol towards them for no readily apparent reason.
Rant over. Sorry. I've stopped smoking you know, cut me some slack...
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 0:44, 4 replies)
who does nothing BUT post shit stories...
Unfortunately, they are literally just shit stories, not actually comical (or even vaguely humorous) tales about shit. And his responses to answers usually consist of his telling somebody that they are a cunt, mostly without constructing a decent argument or providing evidence that demonstrates his point of view. Or, if there is an argument provided, it's generally badly constructed and written as if English is his third language.
Everyone has their own opinions about what is and isn't funny/well written/thought provoking, and I certainly ain't knocking that freedom to choose what someone likes or doesn't like. You don't like someone's stuff - fine, put them on ignore; and if you have something to say to them then say it, as long as it is thought through and you can actually provide a well constructed argument. But don't resort to idle name calling and abuse because (a) it really shouldn't upset you so much, and (b) the chances are that you don't know what that person is really like.
Each to their own I suppose, but I'm certain the rules of the various boards state that if users don't like something, then they should just ignore the post/poster, rather than direct ignorant vitriol towards them for no readily apparent reason.
Rant over. Sorry. I've stopped smoking you know, cut me some slack...
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 0:44, 4 replies)
@althegeordie
There's about 4000 candidates that I can think of...
*joins in al's wondering*
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 10:02, closed)
There's about 4000 candidates that I can think of...
*joins in al's wondering*
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 10:02, closed)
aaaah
It's nice not wandering alone. Although I daresay I was originally wondering whom davros may have been referring too. Can't be arsed to correct it now though.
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 10:20, closed)
It's nice not wandering alone. Although I daresay I was originally wondering whom davros may have been referring too. Can't be arsed to correct it now though.
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 10:20, closed)
al, Enzyme
Decorum where decorum's due - at least I had the decency not to directly name the blighter. Etiquette, you see...
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 13:20, closed)
Decorum where decorum's due - at least I had the decency not to directly name the blighter. Etiquette, you see...
( , Fri 28 Mar 2008, 13:20, closed)
« Go Back