
Smudge the Demon asks: Have your kids - or anyone else's - come out with something that provoked extreme laughter, embarrassment, fear or outrage? Tell us your little darlings' memorable sayings. It's like Take a Break's letters page, only with more swearing
( , Thu 23 May 2013, 15:28)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

you're dishing out some proper playground vigilantism. Really puts you on a moral pedestal you know? Go get him, champ. If it helps, imagine him as a conglomeration of all the nasty bullies that have called your stories boring or whatever.
I, for one, think you're every bit the equal of some of /qotw's best posters. Like Captain Hood-butter, for example.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 16:12, 1 reply)

for rocking up in Monty's thread and generally acting the cunt - still, maybe you and all the other people who give two fucks about Monty's mental health can form the world's smallest support group?
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 16:30, closed)

I thought they did.
Looks to me like strong personal attacks against somebody who pointed out that this very obviously poor joke was a poor joke.
Are you the guy with the dodgy website? You attract a fair bit of flak yourself. Are you not just closing ranks with Pooflake because you're both picked on a lot? A sort of "enemy's enemy" style arrangement?
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 16:35, closed)

I thought they did.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 16:42, closed)

( , Tue 28 May 2013, 16:49, closed)

See, I'm only having this conversation with you because you jumped on me when I was replying to Pooflake. That's why I asked you if you were closing ranks with him.
The problem here is, whilst Pooflake's not terribly amusing and seems rather more angry than is necessary, he's not actually done anything questionable. Whereas you've got a website on which you pay girls to shove toys up their bits so you can take photos of them. Having you stick up for him is doing Pooflake more harm than good.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 16:54, closed)

The whole "emvee pays girls to shove toys up their bits" never happened except in the imaginations of some of this site's least clever contributors. That you're even bringing it up at all speaks volumes about you.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 17:15, closed)

It does have to do with girls posing with toys and so on, though? I take it that the toys remain external, then. Is it still a sexual fetish site, or are they posing with Optimus for artistic reasons? In their pants or without?
I'm just asking for clarification here, you understand. I certainly wouldn't want to be inaccurate about the degree of depravity.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 17:25, closed)

hitler had more morals than this guy. HITLER.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 17:35, closed)

And the models direct the shoots, so the content varies - sometimes they want a Transformers-themed shoot, sometimes it's Star Wars, Mario, Spider-Man - pretty much anything sci-fi, games or comics-related. These days we do a lot more cosplay stuff, since that's popular right now. Oh, and the level of nudity is entirely at the model's discretion - about half our shoots have been (just about) safe for work.
I appreciate that to some of the shutins on here who've never so much as seen a real woman, that must seem like "depravity".
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 17:58, closed)

Next time I need an opinion from an emotionally crippled fatty I'll be sure to ask you
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 19:45, closed)

off you pop then, those playpeople won't insert themselves.
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 19:51, closed)

it must have taken ages for Rory to think that one up
( , Tue 28 May 2013, 20:03, closed)

( , Wed 29 May 2013, 9:49, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread