Conspiracy theory nutters
I keep getting collared by a bloke who says that the war in Afghanistan is a cover for our Illuminati Freemason Shapeshifting Lizard masters to corner the market in mind-bending drugs. "It's true," he says, "I heard it on TalkSport". Tell us your stories of encounters with tinfoil hatters.
Thanks to Davros' Granddad
( , Thu 27 Aug 2009, 13:52)
I keep getting collared by a bloke who says that the war in Afghanistan is a cover for our Illuminati Freemason Shapeshifting Lizard masters to corner the market in mind-bending drugs. "It's true," he says, "I heard it on TalkSport". Tell us your stories of encounters with tinfoil hatters.
Thanks to Davros' Granddad
( , Thu 27 Aug 2009, 13:52)
« Go Back
Pentagon Crash
My Dad's absolutely convinced himself (he's ex-RAF) that the flight of the hijacked aircraft into the Pentagon was not done by a Saudi pilot who knew nothing about flying.
When talking to him about the attacks shortly after the video stills had been released my father made the pursing-of-lips "phew!" noise normally associated with him being impressed by something.
His exact quote: "That's some bit of flying".
( , Fri 28 Aug 2009, 0:47, 6 replies)
My Dad's absolutely convinced himself (he's ex-RAF) that the flight of the hijacked aircraft into the Pentagon was not done by a Saudi pilot who knew nothing about flying.
When talking to him about the attacks shortly after the video stills had been released my father made the pursing-of-lips "phew!" noise normally associated with him being impressed by something.
His exact quote: "That's some bit of flying".
( , Fri 28 Aug 2009, 0:47, 6 replies)
I know a few pilots
They generally agree that it was a piece of neat flying to hit the twin towers; that most pilots at captain-level would have a hard time taking the controls manually (with no automated guidance as you get when landing for instance) to accomplish such a "feat", never mind a severely undertrained terrorist. A lot of them claim to have seen UFOs too and one I know even has mobile phone photos.
Not posting more as a full qotw entry as these pilots generally don't like to advertise such opinions and experiences, as the civil aviation authority takes a dim view - I've already been warned about posting certain info on message boards that could be traced back to certain people. Not paranoia.. the airline industry is a very strange world.
( , Fri 28 Aug 2009, 12:27, closed)
They generally agree that it was a piece of neat flying to hit the twin towers; that most pilots at captain-level would have a hard time taking the controls manually (with no automated guidance as you get when landing for instance) to accomplish such a "feat", never mind a severely undertrained terrorist. A lot of them claim to have seen UFOs too and one I know even has mobile phone photos.
Not posting more as a full qotw entry as these pilots generally don't like to advertise such opinions and experiences, as the civil aviation authority takes a dim view - I've already been warned about posting certain info on message boards that could be traced back to certain people. Not paranoia.. the airline industry is a very strange world.
( , Fri 28 Aug 2009, 12:27, closed)
I expect knowing you're definitely going to die takes a lot of the worry out of it.
Lets you concentrate bettor on your flying.
( , Sun 30 Aug 2009, 0:08, closed)
Lets you concentrate bettor on your flying.
( , Sun 30 Aug 2009, 0:08, closed)
Messsage board warrior twats
I was not voicing an opinion; simply stating that many pilots consider 9/11 to be a near-impossibility in the form that it was reported. Twat off. And the word "neat" here implies that to hit the twin towers would have taken ultra-precise skill, and is used ironically in its other sense.
( , Wed 2 Sep 2009, 18:02, closed)
I was not voicing an opinion; simply stating that many pilots consider 9/11 to be a near-impossibility in the form that it was reported. Twat off. And the word "neat" here implies that to hit the twin towers would have taken ultra-precise skill, and is used ironically in its other sense.
( , Wed 2 Sep 2009, 18:02, closed)
Was it a miracle of precision?
Width of runway at Heathrow: 45 metres.
Width of one of the towers: 63 metres.
I am aware that airliners are generally guided in to Heathrow electronically, but I'd suggest that most pilots could easily hit a target that wide without help, particularly if it didn't matter where along the length of it they arrived. And it's not as though these guys took over the aircraft on a whim, they did do quite a bit of training in professional simulators first.
And I might be more impressed by the Pentagon pilot if he hadn't have bounced off the grass in front of the building first.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 10:26, closed)
Width of runway at Heathrow: 45 metres.
Width of one of the towers: 63 metres.
I am aware that airliners are generally guided in to Heathrow electronically, but I'd suggest that most pilots could easily hit a target that wide without help, particularly if it didn't matter where along the length of it they arrived. And it's not as though these guys took over the aircraft on a whim, they did do quite a bit of training in professional simulators first.
And I might be more impressed by the Pentagon pilot if he hadn't have bounced off the grass in front of the building first.
( , Thu 3 Sep 2009, 10:26, closed)
« Go Back