B3ta Villain of the Year 2010
We voted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as B3ta's Person of the Year. Who do you have as 2010's scoundrel and why?
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 12:34)
We voted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as B3ta's Person of the Year. Who do you have as 2010's scoundrel and why?
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 12:34)
« Go Back
Vince Cable
For fumbling the biggest chance in three decades to limit the poisonous influence of the Murdoch family because he was too busy boasting to a couple of pretty girls.
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 13:50, 8 replies)
For fumbling the biggest chance in three decades to limit the poisonous influence of the Murdoch family because he was too busy boasting to a couple of pretty girls.
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 13:50, 8 replies)
He was even more of a mug
for thinking he even had a chance of getting one over on News International. Most of these Lib Dems have suddenly developed a massively inflated sense of their own importance/influence.
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 13:57, closed)
for thinking he even had a chance of getting one over on News International. Most of these Lib Dems have suddenly developed a massively inflated sense of their own importance/influence.
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 13:57, closed)
It was never going to happen under the Tories
How strange that a non-pro-Murdoch minister in a Tory government was forced out after a sting by a right-wing paper. Whodathunkit???
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:06, closed)
How strange that a non-pro-Murdoch minister in a Tory government was forced out after a sting by a right-wing paper. Whodathunkit???
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:06, closed)
You're forgetting that the Torygraph has no love for Murdoch, though.
Yes, it happens to share a certain party-political affiliation with the Sun and Times; but it's ideologically rather different, and is, when it comes down to brass tacks, still a commercial rival.
(Also, note that Murdoch only ever has political allegiances as a matter of convenience. He supported Labour between 1997 and about 2009.)
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:11, closed)
Yes, it happens to share a certain party-political affiliation with the Sun and Times; but it's ideologically rather different, and is, when it comes down to brass tacks, still a commercial rival.
(Also, note that Murdoch only ever has political allegiances as a matter of convenience. He supported Labour between 1997 and about 2009.)
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:11, closed)
It's not about editorial line or commercial rivalry
It's about issues of ownership, where there might well be common ground
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:20, closed)
It's about issues of ownership, where there might well be common ground
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:20, closed)
Apparently the heir apparent (James Murdoch)
isn't particularly interested in print media and would prefer to concentrate on telly/new media...so yeah, encouraging him in that direction (by allowing greater ownership of BSB) would be useful for commercial rivals. Possibly.
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:24, closed)
isn't particularly interested in print media and would prefer to concentrate on telly/new media...so yeah, encouraging him in that direction (by allowing greater ownership of BSB) would be useful for commercial rivals. Possibly.
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:24, closed)
I think it would have been better if the
pretty girls had slept with Cable for the information, we could of then seen the headline -
LAYING CABLE
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:38, closed)
pretty girls had slept with Cable for the information, we could of then seen the headline -
LAYING CABLE
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 14:38, closed)
« Go Back