I think you've had your 5 minutes in the spotlight...
You aint gonna pull it back now.
( The magic of chutney Shakes it like an Instagram filter!, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:08, 1 reply)

wasnt intending to
Just proving that what people write as a QOTW isnt necerssraly what they truely feel, believe or to be the truth. Having now written a strong case of either side of the coin. Maybe I truthfully sit somewhere in the middle of both.

Some people on this site seem to believe that what people write is the gospel truth. When in reality, what we write is for entertainment. This is an entertsinment site afterall.
(Miggyman, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:59, closed)

I'm not sure that either of them are "a strong case"
seeing as you've made two diametrically opposed posts and have been heckled to fuck for both of them.
( Wet-chinned bag shanker Cannot parse Wogan, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:17, closed)

gah, mindpiss

( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:20, closed)

Yes that was also on purpose
I expected to be hackled for this one as much as the other. As I said above. Just proving a point that I can write a side for each. It doesnt mean I personally stand by what I write, as I was accused of on the other post.

Also just proves that people on here just don't have a clue what they want. Hackled by those that have kids and family on the other post and hackled by those that done have kids and family on this one!!
(Miggyman, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:25, closed)

I think the point is more that people do know what they want
They just object to you telling them what it is
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:27, closed)

No, the point is:
He's a wanker, mentally masturbating thinking he is so full of knowledge to impart to us with his two opposing comments that are both poorly written and do not begin to teach is the lesson he so brilliantly is able to expound upon (in his own self view anyway).
(MichaelS wasn't picked again, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 16:01, closed)

I think it really shows what people DON'T want
which is deliberately obtuse, faux-enigmatic bullshit designed purely to irritate whilst granting the author a totally unwarranted sense of righteousness.

This is the first time I've ever been mean to someone here. Congratulations, you twat.
( Wet-chinned bag shanker Cannot parse Wogan, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:29, closed)

oh, please.
write a borderline-obsessive post, get flamed for it, write the complete opposite, get flamed for it?

simple! just pretend you MEANT to do that all along. is that whizzing noise i can hear the sound of you frantically backpedalling?
( janet aylia y'all motherfuckers need jesus, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 16:42, closed)

at least you have company in the brain-trust of people who can't tell the difference between 'heckles' and 'hackles'...
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 16:52, closed)

I think "strong case" is stretching it a bit for either of them

( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:20, closed)

This is hands-down the most ham-fisted and transparent attempt at a cover/recovery I've seen in a long, long time.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 16:36, closed)