
But rather than definite 0 and 1 states, you have superpositions of states, such as "mainly 0 but slightly 1" (sort of).
You still have just two choices, but you don't have to make the choice until you want the final answer.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:13, archived)

They're three opposing states, like three perpendicular lines on a 3D axis. Rock, paper, scissors. Larry, Curly, Moe.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:14, archived)

they're many many many years away from becoming a workable reality, and even if (when) they do become reality some cunts will just try and massacre people with them.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:16, archived)

but the ones I read about used 'qubits', i.e. quantim bits, i.e. quantum binary digits.
You could have 'trinary' arithmetic with a perfectly classical computer, it'd just be a lot more complicated to construct than a traditional binary computer.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:16, archived)

Practicality is necessary for grand-scale application of a technology.
I think much of it has to do with the way people are taught. We live on (apparently) flat ground. For thousands of years we believe in opposites. The sky and the ground, heaven and hell, yes and no.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:19, archived)

I remain sceptical. Quantum computing works fine as a mathematical toy, but is a LONG way from being proven even as a physical possibility.
And as for things being teleported across regions of space, nothing short of a method of manipulating space-time will allow that, quantum computers or not.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:23, archived)

Thanks, I feel refreshed now.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:26, archived)

The art of eating burgers. So I am contented.
( , Thu 4 May 2006, 2:28, archived)