
there are no accurate temperature records past about 150 years ago
( , Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:11, archived)

but fossil evidence can give information that can be extrapolated
( , Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:15, archived)

and I suspect the timeframe is too short for fossil records and accurate carbon analysis. I mean, you can look at old trees and tell which years were warm/cold/wet/dry but nothing with any degree of accuracy.
Anyway, the last few tens of thousands of years have been us coming out of a major ice age with a few mini ice-age blips. Stands to reason the average temperature will increase
For the record, I believe that human activity is responsible for global warming, no question, but that doesn't mean there is any PROOF, and that's where enviromental groups fall down.
After all, the earth has been a lot lot warmer than this in the past, before we could possibly have had an influence.
( , Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:23, archived)

that's the point. (unless you're talking about just after it was 'created')
( , Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:29, archived)

there have been significant periods where there have been no polar ice caps. I'd classify that as "warmer"
( , Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:36, archived)

is that there are plenty of other reasons not to drive big fuck-off SUVs and emit giant chemical clouds from factories. But because this reason receives all of the attention and can't be proven, people dismiss the whole topic.
( , Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:30, archived)