
if it wasn't common knowledge.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:10, archived)

I saw a bit of it in a pub at one point, but pub televisions usually have sports on anyway.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:11, archived)

It's not as if it's a dull and slow-paced 15-part comic strip about a kidnapping that takes about four fucking years to tell
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:14, archived)

is all I can say.
Well, it's not all I can say. I can also say "galvanised steel", and various other things.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:15, archived)

Or maybe some stupid thing like "Yeah, I was kidnappedfish!" and then we'll find out some tedious fact about a creature called the Nappedfish.
Or something like that.
And then he'll explain why it is meant to be funny by using a 500-word essay underneath the strip itself
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:17, archived)

What have I done to piss YOU off?
And no, there's no pun punchline.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:19, archived)

by the looks of it. That's enough to make some people really cross.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:21, archived)

But his talent is being wasted in a webcomic that's yet to make me laugh. And I'm also not the biggest fan of having to explain a joke underneath the strip itself. I've never understood that.
I won't say any more on the matter
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:23, archived)

it's not his fault some people have to look underneath it to get the joke.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:26, archived)

if Bill Waterson wrote down things like "in this one, Hobbes is asking how broke the binoculars are and suggests he might be able to fix them. Calvin fetches the binoculars, and says "don't sneeze", because they have been broken so much, they've been grounded into dust!" and the bottom of each strip
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:28, archived)

Hardly ever. And it's only because of lack of confidence in my own sequential art story telling ability that I feel the need to explain anyway.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:30, archived)

It doesn't make me laugh but that doesn't matter, it's a good read/look anyway.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:35, archived)

Odd-Fish is an experiment, mostly in stamina to challenge myself to work to deadlines and to keep up a constant output. I am aware that the writing is sometimes lacking but nonetheless, Odd-Fish has to date been far more successful in terms of positive response than anything I've done before.
As for wasting my talent, Thanks you for the compliment but I'd only consider it wasted if by drawing odd-fish I avoiding something more worthwhile. What could I do that's more worthy?
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:28, archived)

I think an short animated film in your style would be pretty epic
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:29, archived)

It would be awesome though, I must admit.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:31, archived)

in a broadsheet
Or to replace the really unfunny guy who draws the T2 cartoons in The Times
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:32, archived)

but I REALLY don't have the patience.
Each drawing takes 2 to 4 hours.
12 drawings a second for animation. Eep!
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:32, archived)

He'd have to give up his entire life for the next 3 years to do a 5-minute short!
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:39, archived)

I don't think I'd have time.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:39, archived)

but have you considered the possibility that he's not righting it specifically for you?
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:33, archived)

And don't say "oh, I meant 'righting', as in 'correcting", because if you meant that, you're inadvertently agreeing with me.
And all I'm trying to do here is give constructive criticism.
( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 14:35, archived)