b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 5365768 (Thread)

sorry, I just see anyone who has an invisible friend above the age of 8
as mentally ill.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:25, archived)
Sorry, I just see someone who gives a shit about what I believe when it affects them in exactly 0 ways
as someone who has far too much time on their hands and not enough intelligence to fill it.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:26, archived)
well you brought it into the argument!
I don't care. Live your life. Talk to your delusions at night.

No need to get so uppity when someone badmouths a bedtime story.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:28, archived)
'sorry, I just see anyone who has an invisible friend above the age of 8'
If you can't take it, don't dish it. If you don't care, then having to make the point in your profile... well, that hardly adds up.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:30, archived)
Go away and read some proper philosophy.

(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:34, archived)
An inability to see the world from the perspective of others' is a form of mental illness.

(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:27, archived)
Autism?

(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:28, archived)
It's actually a mild psychosis.
*snorts, pushes glasses up nose*
Though I'm going to guess that in this case the poster, who has otherwise been excellent, is merely pretentious and young.
And if you tell anyone I've been sticking up for god-botherers I'll burn your church down, you bible eating freak.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:30, archived)
*spits out half chewed page from Corinthians*
I promise.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:32, archived)
I can see the point of a child rapist.
The tight anus of a small boy may be a nice feeling. But I don't think it's right in any way.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:30, archived)
And here we have the old logical fallacy known as the argument by inappropriate analogy.
Wrong when priests use it, wrong when you use it.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:32, archived)
You still can't see the point of religious people, though.

(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:35, archived)
that old rhetorical chestnut.
I can picture you snorting loudly down your nostrils as I write this.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:29, archived)
Here's the point you should make;
"I hate religion but not religious people."
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:34, archived)
Or "I disagree with religion."
That'd be far better.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:40, archived)
I prefer my version.

(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:41, archived)
It's just that "religion" referes to an incredibly wide range of beliefs, practices and organisiation.
To claim hatred of that entire panoply implies several sweeping conclusions.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:44, archived)
I hate religion, peppers, halva, Basingstoke and Chris Moyles.
None of these are people so these are opinions I am free to have.
(, Tue 26 Aug 2008, 17:48, archived)