which, frankly, is bollocks. The reason they got their seats was through the european proportional representation system.
In both seats the BNP obtained, their vote count was lower than that in 2004, but because there was a significant decrease in support for other parties, their overall proportion of vote total was greater than before.
(, Mon 8 Jun 2009, 15:51, archived)
Mind you, the BBC makes a better job of it:
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8088381.stm
5th paragraph
(, Mon 8 Jun 2009, 15:57, archived)
It's not that Britain's on the cusp of fascism, but they're polling nearly a million votes. Plus the Tories did well.
Edit: news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_999999.stm
vs
news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/vote2004/euro_uk/html/front.stm
(, Mon 8 Jun 2009, 15:59, archived)
so to some retards it doesn't matter who they vote for as long as it's NOT Labour.
I'm more worried about the UKIP getting so much support, really. I'm not utterly convinced that's not just racism lite.
(, Mon 8 Jun 2009, 16:27, archived)
... thus the rest of europe, and the world as a whole, will think that their supported by our country. It's also a sign as to the future of this country when the propper elections happen next year (or whenever they happen).
It maybe a relativly small voice they've been given, but it's still giving them one.
On the other hand, if the people vote for them, then we have domocracy for a reason, it's the pitfalls of giving the people a vote, and at the same time, the media scaremongering the people into falling for BNP's scare tactics.
* I think, I'm not sure exactly how it all works.
(, Mon 8 Jun 2009, 16:01, archived)
"Fortunately", the European Parliament doesn't have legislative initiative, so those BNP MEPs can't actually do very much. Hooray for lack of democracy, in this instance.
(, Mon 8 Jun 2009, 16:06, archived)