
for a basic html course.
Do I do 4.01, or xhtml + basic css? 20 hours class time roughly.
For those of you who have no idea what html is, would you want basic notions of good practice first, or just wade in with how to make "Hello World" appear in a table with a picture of a dog next to it?
( , Fri 8 Jul 2005, 19:47, archived)

Don't mention <font> etc, but stick with 4.01 which is far more forgiving than xhtml.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2005, 19:48, archived)

Hrm. I just think CSS is a bit of a can of worms for only 20 hours of classtime.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2005, 19:53, archived)

Xhtml support is patchy at best. You have to serve it with a content-type of text/html to make ie render it properly, which is wrong (if you're being anal).
xhtml and 4.01 strict are semantically very close, but 4.01 permits unclosed tags and forgives case errors, quoting inconsistencies etc.
Gah, you made me think, you bastard. *necks pint*
( , Fri 8 Jul 2005, 19:59, archived)

no point writing about 4.01 anymore!
( , Fri 8 Jul 2005, 19:49, archived)

[head]
[title]
[font] and a brief intro to hex numbers
[center] vs [div]
and obviously [a href] and [img etc]
edit: 20 hours!! It took me less time than that to write this: freespace.virgin.net/eldon.drive/publicgallery1.html
and that's in Notepad with absolutely no help or experience
ok, I realise it's crap
( , Fri 8 Jul 2005, 19:50, archived)