
I just think it would confuse things. There's nothing inconvenient about using the 4rthur one.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:47, archived)

especially if they only use B3ta :)
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:48, archived)

Most people who come to bashes are at least aware of 4rthur.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:50, archived)

People shouldnt have to be aware of them... and i suspect it would bring the talk board and main board together if we had our own pub thang
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:53, archived)

Would make it truly aces:)
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:57, archived)

I'm a member of 4rthur (i think) but never go there as I'm too lazy and uninterested.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:58, archived)

then it may also increase the rift between B3ta and 4rthur.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:58, archived)

Everyone flocked to 4rthur when B3ta spazzed up, and 4rthurians invade us when their board is spacking.
There's already far too much tribal conflict between us as it is.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:02, archived)

but i think B3ta's own scheduler would be a good idea or at the least a link to the 4rthur one so everyone can find it and stuff
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:56, archived)

If we had our own, people wouldn't have to be aware of 4rthur
I don't use 4rthur, I just can't be bothered to remember another set of log in details
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 17:56, archived)

I just can't be bothered with it
I don't need another message board, and going to another website is jsut extra hassle.
Having the only pub scheduler there excludes the many b3tans who either aren't aware of it, or just don't bother with 4rthur
Whether or not we 'need' our own is fairly immaterial, it'd just be better to have one. It'd include more people and be more convenient
My point is, why make do when we've been offered something else? We shoul at least give it a try, if it doesn't work, people wont use it
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:03, archived)

I just think it's a bit pointless, since there's a perfectly good 4rthur one already.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:07, archived)

It's like saying we could use...msn groups to organise them
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:09, archived)

There are so so many people on b3ta that you only talk to a small percentage, and having a b3ta scheduler would mean lots of people who you don't know signing up to bashes without knowing what they're doing.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:11, archived)

That if there was a B3ta schedular we would speask to more b3tans?And especially mix with more main boarders, i for one welcome mixing more...its an utter shame we dont more often
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:12, archived)

*gasp*
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:12, archived)

More people would come to bashes and you'd meet more people
That's bad how?
Anything that breaks down cliqueyness is good in my opinion. You could always organise private bashes if you wanted
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:12, archived)

People are great and the more the better
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:17, archived)

I like to know, or at least have heard of, most of the people I'm expecting to meet.
Sorry.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:20, archived)

I'd far more prefer a random tunin up and making the effort to meet new people...you simply never know who you will meet sometimes, and thats aces
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:21, archived)

but I'm an emotionally-scarred reclusive social reject who is frightened of people.
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:23, archived)

But look at that, it's grown into it's own community, with differant people and tastes
The same thing could happen here
People are quite welcome to keep using the 4rthur one, but I think a b3tan one would serve a differant audience
Edit: and another thing, not everyone uses the same name on 4rthur and b3ta, a 'who's going' thing with everyone's b3tan names would be extremely useful to people who don't use 4rthur
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:08, archived)

So I'm absolutely gagging for one
( , Sun 31 Jul 2005, 18:14, archived)