b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 7216487 (Thread)

That I have such an interest
in seeing horrific films. I watched A Serbian Film yesterday just to upset myself. It worked :s
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:47, archived)
crikey, you're a brave one
although I'm a bit of a fan of 'horror' in context, having read the plot via wikipedia a few weeks ago, I'm destined to stay clear of that I think
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:50, archived)
It's weird.
I think it would've affected me more had I not read the wiki synopsis. Since I knew what was coming, it was still horrible but because I already knew it didn't make the impact it was supposed to. Not like Martyrs. I knew nothing of that film and subjected FF, Druid and KotP to it. We sat in silence for about 10 minutes after and it plagued my brain for months after.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:52, archived)
*adds to list of things to read up on before watching*

(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:54, archived)
i must watch martyrs again.
sober, this time. is serbian doings just on a torrent?
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:55, archived)
I streamed it yesterday
although I only got the first 72 minutes and had to find the last 40 or so somewhere else.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:56, archived)
torrents are sooooo not good
try usenet instead.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:01, archived)
"A US remake from the producers of Twilight is in the works."

(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:34, archived)
Watch it a couple more times.
Like I said to m0ngy- watch it alongside Made in Serbia to give it some context.

When you get past the obvious explicit horror of the film, it does make some valid points and I think it's beautifully filmed.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:53, archived)
I agree.
It's beautifully filmed and very well acted. Milos is incredible, even though I was getting distracted by a) his cock and b) the fact that he looks like Sam Rockwell.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:55, archived)
The thing is
That Serbia- and before that Yugoslavia- has been a major producer of hardcore pornography for at least 30 or 40 years. It's within that framework that the makers of "A Serbian Film" decided to set the picture.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:59, archived)
isn't that just meant to be ugly, crude and offensive
rather than challenging, gritty and words like that?
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 12:58, archived)
It depends on how you go into watching it.
I read an awful lot about it before it came out. I do see the point the director was trying to make, about victims...
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:00, archived)
Really?
I saw it as being about power and the abuse of power.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:05, archived)
I probably need to watch it again!
I saw it as Milos etc. being victims of, I guess, Vukmir/Vukmir's client's power.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:12, archived)
The perspective I saw it from was more about power than victims.
Oddly enough I watched it again last night- along with Dead Snow.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:37, archived)
I can't convince anyone else to watch it
so I can't have discussions with people in real life about it. No one wants to see it.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:39, archived)
Cowards.
I personally think it is a fairly good film with some obvious metaphors plastered on top. Great cinematography and didn't deserve the fuss it got on release- The Human Centipede is a much more disturbing film.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 14:01, archived)
I won't pretend I'm not ignorant on the intentions, just what I think Mark Kermode told me.
And as I'm a gullible Guardian reader (when I can be bothered) I happily assume everything he says is true.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:08, archived)
Bit of both.
There are about 4 scenes in it that could possibly be considered shocking but they are quite explicitly shocking. It does try- and in my opinion succeeds- to make a point about modern Serbia. The metaphors are laid on with a trowel but it's still worth watching.
(, Tue 14 Jun 2011, 13:04, archived)