You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 8491697 (Thread)

These won’t be for running, unless I’m being chased by David Walliams

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:29, Reply)

get some trainers then, you absolute muppet
(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:29, Reply)
Will I look ‘dope’ and ‘fly’?

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:31, Reply)
You'll look like you're fleeing a crime scene, but stylishly

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:32, Reply)
Perfect

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:32, Reply)
You're welcome, I'll send the invoice to your lawyer

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:34, Reply)
cc INTERNETLAWYERMAN

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:36, Reply)
DEAR INTERNET USER
THE MATTER BEFORE THIS COURT IS WHETHER TRAINERS CONSTITUTE A NECESSARY PURCHASE OR A VEXATIOUS EXPENDITURE. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THAT FOOTWEAR ACQUIRED SOLELY TO APPEAR "DOPE" MAY FALL OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF REASONABLE LIVING EXPENSES? PLEASE FILE PARTICULARS OF INTENDED USE AND WHETHER ANY CHASER IS ACTUALLY IN PURSUIT
(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 12:37, Reply)
Running towards, or away from, David Walliams?

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 13:42, Reply)
Both. Simultaneously.

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 14:01, Reply)
PPT has got until 4:30pm today to decide whether to lodge an appeal,
could be a double sex-pest news day
(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 15:00, Reply)
He missed the deadline, coverage on tomorrow's papers will be a wall I am sure

(, Mon 9 Nov 2026, 20:14, Reply)