Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Tainted it, it was a bit dead, bland ... just not even a patch on the bottled stuff.
Sirrius - we approached with open minds ready to be impressed, but it was pretty grim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:16, 1 reply, 9 years ago)
Sirrius - we approached with open minds ready to be impressed, but it was pretty grim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:16, 1 reply, 9 years ago)
You do realise this was all in your head and that canning beer is better for it than bottling it though, right?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:19, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:19, Reply)
Nuh-uh.
I have had many, many bottles of Sierra Nevada, and only that one can.
It was different; it was grim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:21, Reply)
I have had many, many bottles of Sierra Nevada, and only that one can.
It was different; it was grim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:21, Reply)
How's that? My understanding is that bottles are completely neutral and inert.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:21, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:21, Reply)
Whereas cans somehow impart some evil into the drink?
Beer is susceptible to heat, light and air.
Bottles do not protect it as well as cans do.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:26, Reply)
Beer is susceptible to heat, light and air.
Bottles do not protect it as well as cans do.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:26, Reply)
^^^beerwrong
Cans impart an unwanted metallic taste, bottles don't.
Also canned beers have more gas in.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:31, Reply)
Cans impart an unwanted metallic taste, bottles don't.
Also canned beers have more gas in.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:31, Reply)
If you are not pouring your beer into a glass then you are not fully tasting it.
And more gas? Really?
Come on...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:32, Reply)
And more gas? Really?
Come on...
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:32, Reply)
I like it poured into a pint glass while in a pub rather than drinking cans from a 'slab' kept in a dirty old fridge in the garage like some kind of benefits scum
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:34, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:34, Reply)
Indeed, only plebs drink from a bottle
To me the really cheap stuff isn't that different in can or bottle, it's still crap, but the good stuff is much better from the bottle.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:36, Reply)
To me the really cheap stuff isn't that different in can or bottle, it's still crap, but the good stuff is much better from the bottle.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:36, Reply)
To you, yes.
But if there is a difference, it is the can that would come out on top.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:37, Reply)
But if there is a difference, it is the can that would come out on top.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:37, Reply)
why?
bottles are chemically inert, cans (for all the fancy inside coatings) aren't.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:42, Reply)
bottles are chemically inert, cans (for all the fancy inside coatings) aren't.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:42, Reply)
I'd defy you to taste the difference with both served in a glass.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:46, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:46, Reply)
I can and have
Stella (yuck) is a prime example.
Also, neither cans or bottles are a patch on draught.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:52, Reply)
Stella (yuck) is a prime example.
Also, neither cans or bottles are a patch on draught.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:52, Reply)
Ah yes, you also have some weird opinions on the 'chemicals' in Stella, don't you?
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:55, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:55, Reply)
If you say so
That's the stuff brewed near London though, the real thing from Belgium is much much nicer (similar to how Budvar is to Budweiser).
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:06, Reply)
That's the stuff brewed near London though, the real thing from Belgium is much much nicer (similar to how Budvar is to Budweiser).
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 11:06, Reply)
is it to do with the serving temperature?
Cans get colder than bottles.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:27, Reply)
Cans get colder than bottles.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:27, Reply)
Both are effective for protecting beer from heat and air, bottles allow light in.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:29, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:29, Reply)
Well yes, that is perhaps one of the reasons we think we prefer beer from a bottle.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:31, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:31, Reply)
nobody would have mocked poor old AA if he'd treated himself to payday bottles.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:36, Reply)
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:36, Reply)
Tainted it, it was a bit dead, bland ... just not even a patch on the bottled stuff.
Sirrius - we approached with open minds ready to be impressed, but it was pretty grim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:37, Reply)
Sirrius - we approached with open minds ready to be impressed, but it was pretty grim.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:37, Reply)
Cans and bottles get equally cold or warm
but cans will cool or warm faster due to being thinner and metal.
Beer is best served in glass either way, cans warm up quicker than glasses.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:39, Reply)
but cans will cool or warm faster due to being thinner and metal.
Beer is best served in glass either way, cans warm up quicker than glasses.
( , Thu 18 Dec 2014, 10:39, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread