
the subject and first focus is on the Iraquis now, the American appears to be an intuder in the frame of the picture.
(metaphors)
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:05,
archived)
(metaphors)

what with the gun and all..
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:06,
archived)

in the 2nd one the solder appears to be moving more towards the man
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:07,
archived)

I didn't intend for the soldier to stick out like that, but he really does. it looks like a collage now.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:11,
archived)

You could probably do a nice 2 or 3 year study on peoples perceptions of images when given no context only the images themseleves.
Research funded by advertising agencies maybe.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14,
archived)
Research funded by advertising agencies maybe.

I wonder which way round the photo(s) were before he doctored them.
I must say, all the propaganda in this war is starting to get to me.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:10,
archived)
I must say, all the propaganda in this war is starting to get to me.

but Mrs. GR££DY always had it on, it's like osmosis, only...blunter, more intrusive.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14,
archived)

TV the drug of a nation
or something along those lines...
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:25,
archived)
or something along those lines...

I meant before they were published. I mean, who's to say the "originals" are the originals. See? ;)
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:27,
archived)

that perhaps even those originals (supplied by the nicked photographer) weren't the real originals.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:27,
archived)

all the others are the 'correct' way around.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:14,
archived)

genius.
let me do all the hours of work and then flip it around in 5 seconds and get all the credit!
warhol!
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:17,
archived)
let me do all the hours of work and then flip it around in 5 seconds and get all the credit!
warhol!

left handed?
[EDIT]You're right, useful thing to know, that[/EDIT]
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:20,
archived)
[EDIT]You're right, useful thing to know, that[/EDIT]

right handed, even lefty's use them.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:23,
archived)

look more aggressive, and the soldier more panicky and defensive. like he's backing up nervously.
the whole thing looks staged anyway.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:09,
archived)
the whole thing looks staged anyway.

Art rocks. I mean seriously fucking rocks.
It's like philosophy put down where you can see and touch it.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:12,
archived)
It's like philosophy put down where you can see and touch it.

and we see movement and time passage that way too.
so the innate movement in every painting enters at the left and leaves at the right.
so you should see the soldier backing up toward the right and the iraqis advancing from the left, or in the original painting, the soldier has arrived from the left on the scene and is telling the man who's moving the wrong direction in the picture to please take up his place in the right of the picture again.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:16,
archived)
so the innate movement in every painting enters at the left and leaves at the right.
so you should see the soldier backing up toward the right and the iraqis advancing from the left, or in the original painting, the soldier has arrived from the left on the scene and is telling the man who's moving the wrong direction in the picture to please take up his place in the right of the picture again.

except the gun the soldier is holding is kind of disconcerting.
I feel he's more likely to start shooting at random people in Fnord's version.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:18,
archived)
I feel he's more likely to start shooting at random people in Fnord's version.

now you say that, I think you're right. There's only one thing for it - don't think.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:12,
archived)

which is why the photographer lost his job. I think we may have forgotten that little nugget along the way...
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:29,
archived)