

In Africa, people don't sing at football matches; they blow vuvuzelas. Basically their gripe is that "this African world cup is too African and not European enough."
The thing is; they sound nothing like bees. They sound more like...well, horns frankly. www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X031mwwuLg They're no worse than rattles and airhorns and dickheads shouting.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:24,
archived)
The thing is; they sound nothing like bees. They sound more like...well, horns frankly. www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X031mwwuLg They're no worse than rattles and airhorns and dickheads shouting.

( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:32,
archived)

Everyone should stop whining. Imagine if the world cup were in England, and the fans were told they can't sing at the games because people watching in Japan don't like it. That's basically what everyone seems to want to happen.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:32,
archived)

the only people complaining are the broadcasters like Sky Sports. I figure it's because they have an idea of what a football match should be like, and their viewers have an expectation of what a football match should be like, and they're worried their viewers will be turned off by being offered a football experience that is outside of their usual cultural sphere. Europeans expect singing and chanting; that's what happens at a football match if you're European. Personally I think the broadcasters are being a bit patronising by assuming that their viewers are so small-minded, that's what TV is all about these days - they would rather change the facts to fit the expected story than just report the facts - and sports reporting is no different.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:36,
archived)

The only time I've heard those horns is when it was decided that it's fun to "rickroll" with them. If I had to tolerate that tuneless dirge for longer than 30 seconds I'd be irritated.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:55,
archived)

but to go to a football match and complain about the noise is a bit much. They may be annoying when taken out of the context of a lively football match, but in their proper setting they are no worse than any other form of terrace vocalisation.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:59,
archived)

I'm bored of drrrrhorns now anyway. GOOD DEBATING A+++
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:01,
archived)

They produce 100db each, a jumbo jet is 130. I just hope all the international fans.. (yes its an INTERNATIONAL tournament) sue this shit out FIFA for permanent hearing damage.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:45,
archived)

If you go to a match at Wembley. I'm sure noise levels are well within agreed safety standards.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:53,
archived)

In 2005 a groupd of Finish boy scouts produced a scream measuring over 127db.
The OSHA advice is that noise of 100db-105db is safe to be exposed to for upto a maximum of 2 hours at any one session.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 18:54,
archived)
The OSHA advice is that noise of 100db-105db is safe to be exposed to for upto a maximum of 2 hours at any one session.

And 110dB is twice as loud as 100dB, and so on? And a normal conversation is about 60dB?
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:00,
archived)

Stated that they posed a very real risk of hearing damage.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:03,
archived)

I wish. But really, its ridiculous!! Its ruining the game for so many people, why every game? Why not just SA games? Don't you want to hear the commentary? Also plastic horns made in china (FIFA organised contract) do not constitute culture. If every fan bought a fog horn or a tuba (imagine - more than one note/sound) to English games it would be a joke!!
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:26,
archived)

( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 20:29,
archived)

Just saying that the jumbo jet comparison is a misleading one.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:06,
archived)

THAT'S HOW TERRIBLE THIS IS. FORTY MILLION PEOPLE MIGHT DIE.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:08,
archived)

when measured from 100ft away.
( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:08,
archived)

( ,
Mon 14 Jun 2010, 19:31,
archived)