
that the idiots with the most controversial views get completely disproportionate media coverage?
Why are the fuckwits always in control of the message?
( ,
Wed 8 Sep 2010, 10:51,
archived)
Why are the fuckwits always in control of the message?

You can't be quite right in the head of you share a name with a Python!:P
( ,
Wed 8 Sep 2010, 10:53,
archived)

...should include a disclaimer that the views of outlying nutter in question does not represent the views of the majority of nice, tea drinking, civilised inhabitants of this green and pleasant land, and any anger or retaliation should be directed against said nutter directly...
( ,
Wed 8 Sep 2010, 10:57,
archived)

Not paying attention to news properly.
Small Church in 'Merka? Now I'm not surprised...
( ,
Wed 8 Sep 2010, 11:01,
archived)
Small Church in 'Merka? Now I'm not surprised...

and provide more trainwreck entertainment than cats stuck up trees.
( ,
Wed 8 Sep 2010, 11:00,
archived)

1. Nutso minority says something outrageous
2. Sensationalist press stokes it up to sell more papers
3. Nutso minority with opposing view says something outrageous
4. Initial nutso minority says "See, told you they were nuts!"
5. Opposing nutso minority carries out atrocity.
6. Cheryl Cole becomes ill and both nutso minorities are swiftly forgotten.
( ,
Wed 8 Sep 2010, 11:05,
archived)
2. Sensationalist press stokes it up to sell more papers
3. Nutso minority with opposing view says something outrageous
4. Initial nutso minority says "See, told you they were nuts!"
5. Opposing nutso minority carries out atrocity.
6. Cheryl Cole becomes ill and both nutso minorities are swiftly forgotten.