
* Sorry about the rate but for some reason h has pissed me off, it's not like I am pushing his posts down the board?
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 7:40,
archived)

Far far worse get posted but if that is classed as nsfw then might be worth dixon considering if he should be on b3ta during work hours because far worse gets posted everyday
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 7:43,
archived)

Thanks mate, that is exactly what I thought...
I reallydid do not think that is NSFW.
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 7:48,
archived)
I really

it goes against the rule in the FAQ, the only thing Dixon has done wrong is dare to point that out. If you know his work you'd know he's not exactly a prude.
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 7:52,
archived)

doesn't mean everyone can/should. B3ta is a comedy site, go you should g elsewhere if you want something to wank to.
or are you saying if someone posts enough child porn then that becomes ok too?
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 7:51,
archived)
or are you saying if someone posts enough child porn then that becomes ok too?

and not all pics on b3ta are comedy pics. how many magenta cdc pics go up everyday? the wb morning pics are not what I would call wanking material or anything harder than what you would see in advert for perfume.
And I am not gay for WB.
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 7:55,
archived)
And I am not gay for WB.

is a little saucier than "A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear" which according to the FAQ "is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity"
So if you want to argue with the FAQ, take it up with a mod
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:02,
archived)
So if you want to argue with the FAQ, take it up with a mod

I thought we were just discussing where the nsfw line actually was
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:05,
archived)

and it seems that, to some, wb got it wrong on that occasion.
we should probably move on
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:07,
archived)
we should probably move on

discuss it with a mod.
As it stands, a big titted topless woman is defined as NSFW by the FAQ
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:08,
archived)
As it stands, a big titted topless woman is defined as NSFW by the FAQ

move along people nothing to see here
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:14,
archived)

* Sorry, what I meant was "What that charming, fully clothed lady" said.
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:15,
archived)

then I discovered you can ignore yourself and the world became a little bit emptier
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:17,
archived)

The fact that 99% of them arent is beside the point.
( ,
Mon 9 May 2011, 8:03,
archived)