
never mind, all those cancery babies probably deserved it
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:12,
archived)

b3ta is shits 'n' giggle mainly, trying to mix charity with Maddie and 9/11 Jokes (et al) is a little 'square peg in round hole'-esque.
If it does happen, then the newsletter is the best place for spamming it via eBay or wherever.
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:15,
archived)
If it does happen, then the newsletter is the best place for spamming it via eBay or wherever.

I don't want to annoy the majority of b3ta users, even if it does cure aids
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:17,
archived)

at least that way, a majority of b3ta gets a say, and can have an input :)
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:19,
archived)

I assume people who don't partake of the image board are doing so because they're sick of the sight of our scribblings, and quite unlikely to want to buy one of them.
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:23,
archived)

and if you truly want the majority of b3ta to have a say, you need to ask them.
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:25,
archived)

then they will see this?
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:26,
archived)

it's down to more than just regular users of one particular board. You may get more support from /links, /ot etc. than you realise.
Who's to say b3tans who don't post images may not be willing to buy one from those that do? Even those who don't visit here all that often.
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:29,
archived)
Who's to say b3tans who don't post images may not be willing to buy one from those that do? Even those who don't visit here all that often.

I just think that the image board contributors and viewers may be best people to ask about something done on the image board. In much the same way as while I do look at the talk board and comment rarely I'm not going to tell them how to do stuff on there :)
There's nothing stopping them popping over here and having a vote. I just don't want to go over there, say the wrong thing and cause all of them to come and click the fuck off option in response to me accidentally pissing them off.
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:33,
archived)
There's nothing stopping them popping over here and having a vote. I just don't want to go over there, say the wrong thing and cause all of them to come and click the fuck off option in response to me accidentally pissing them off.

also makes it appear very 'cliquey'
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:35,
archived)

it's not, its for everyone with an interest, or if the majority want it to fuck off, then that's what it will do
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:36,
archived)

Can't really testify to /talk (without goping down the obvious cliche road of /talk-dissing) or /ot since I don't really frequent...
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:25,
archived)

it will needs input of all for charity suggestions, then a separate poll every time to be impartial. I'd suggest the 'artwork' is prepared (and displayed online here somewhere) before the charity is decided/announced
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:24,
archived)

some people may only want to donate artwork once they know who they're giving it away for.
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:26,
archived)

it's a fickle thing
( ,
Mon 6 Jun 2011, 15:27,
archived)