Given some of the 'interesting' cases turning up in courtthis would not surprise me in the least
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8692007/London-riots-youth-worker-and-Army-recruit-among-those-in-court.html
(www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8692007/London-riots-youth-worker-and-Army-recruit-among-those-in-court.html
Joe Scaramanga with a G-double-O-D vibration,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:01,
archived)
lol"Several alleged looters admitted to trespassing in shops but insisted they were looking for friends at the time to try and persuade them to leave."
Yes, that would be right.
(Yes, that would be right.
boris the spider,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:07,
archived)
Indeed.I mean - why on earth would they lie?
(
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:12,
archived)
They wouldn't, of course!It's what anyone would do. Every time I go past a shop with broken shutters and a smashed window and full of pricks in hoodies stealing flatscreen tellies I *always* go in to find my chums and tell them that they shouldn't be doing this.
( boris the spider,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:13,
archived)
I like this one:"He did not enter a plea and the case was adjourned. He was granted conditional bail on the grounds that he wears an electronic tag and adheres to a curfew."
Adheres to a curfew that sent him into the nearest riot to loot and pillage, trustworthy tag that.
(Adheres to a curfew that sent him into the nearest riot to loot and pillage, trustworthy tag that.
SauronWibble I'll hold it, you lick it...,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 14:52,
archived)