![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Everyone here just ignores me most of the time anyway.
I'm off, you rotten shower of cunts.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 22:53,
archived)
I'm off, you rotten shower of cunts.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
..it's always good for a laugh......unfortunately it ain't working at the moment:(.......check it when it is...it's an excellent chuckle :)
spiekermann.com/en/art-bollocks/
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 22:59,
archived)
spiekermann.com/en/art-bollocks/
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But my original question was more an enquiry as to what mofaha had found to be effective technique for his eyefuckers.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:05,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Now be a love and put this lotion on it's skin. Ta v much.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:11,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I was looking at the one that's often called "annoying beans" and it looks as if the rotation of the beans, which is apparent due to the contrast of light and dark edges, flounce flounce flouncey flouncey flounce.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:20,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's trial and error? They're definitely getting gooderer.
Maybe eyefuckers could be an image challenge.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:24,
archived)
Maybe eyefuckers could be an image challenge.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
We could hold it during national migraine awareness week.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:27,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and rob could put banner ads for migraine medications on the site for the week, make some cash on click-throughs
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:29,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I think has something to do with the fact that your brain tries to make sense of the shading in terms of light direction, but since the shading is rotated in each component (suggesting an impossible lighting arrangement), the whole thing shifts visually as your mind tries to resolve the new shading information in a way that makes sense over the whole image.
That's a guess, but if you work on that assumption in the way that I have right here, it does start to fuck up visually, so even if I'm wrong about the reason, it's not a bad approach.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:28,
archived)
That's a guess, but if you work on that assumption in the way that I have right here, it does start to fuck up visually, so even if I'm wrong about the reason, it's not a bad approach.