![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![](http://www.mofahaimages.com/b3ta/vis3_2.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
How would you describe the technique?
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 22:33,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Everyone here just ignores me most of the time anyway.
I'm off, you rotten shower of cunts.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 22:53,
archived)
I'm off, you rotten shower of cunts.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
..it's always good for a laugh......unfortunately it ain't working at the moment:(.......check it when it is...it's an excellent chuckle :)
spiekermann.com/en/art-bollocks/
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 22:59,
archived)
spiekermann.com/en/art-bollocks/
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But my original question was more an enquiry as to what mofaha had found to be effective technique for his eyefuckers.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:05,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Now be a love and put this lotion on it's skin. Ta v much.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:11,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I was looking at the one that's often called "annoying beans" and it looks as if the rotation of the beans, which is apparent due to the contrast of light and dark edges, flounce flounce flouncey flouncey flounce.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:20,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's trial and error? They're definitely getting gooderer.
Maybe eyefuckers could be an image challenge.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:24,
archived)
Maybe eyefuckers could be an image challenge.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
We could hold it during national migraine awareness week.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:27,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and rob could put banner ads for migraine medications on the site for the week, make some cash on click-throughs
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:29,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I think has something to do with the fact that your brain tries to make sense of the shading in terms of light direction, but since the shading is rotated in each component (suggesting an impossible lighting arrangement), the whole thing shifts visually as your mind tries to resolve the new shading information in a way that makes sense over the whole image.
That's a guess, but if you work on that assumption in the way that I have right here, it does start to fuck up visually, so even if I'm wrong about the reason, it's not a bad approach.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:28,
archived)
That's a guess, but if you work on that assumption in the way that I have right here, it does start to fuck up visually, so even if I'm wrong about the reason, it's not a bad approach.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I might have a go sometime. I haven't had any hallucinogenics for years, but I do enjoy these little reminders.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:37,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
what you are planning. If you are at least let me send you a good copy and not this over optimised crap.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:14,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
As I was rotating the colour of the background the whole thing was shifting very alarmingly. Some colour combos seem to work better than others. I think colour plays a part in the illusion of movement, but I haven't really worked out how yet.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:31,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You know your eyes have rods and cones? Well one of them does the edge detecting (usually by differences in luminance) and one of them does the colour detecting - I forget which way round it is.
Now if you have two very different colours of equal luminance next to each other, your eyes have trouble deciding where the edges are.
For example - impression at sunrise by Monet - If you turn this into a greyscale, the sun practically disappears. - The reason it seems so ephemeral is that your eyes can't be sure exactly where it is because they don't know where the edges of it are because the luminance of the sun and the sky against which it sits are practically the same.
( ,
Sat 17 Sep 2011, 23:52,
archived)
Now if you have two very different colours of equal luminance next to each other, your eyes have trouble deciding where the edges are.
For example - impression at sunrise by Monet - If you turn this into a greyscale, the sun practically disappears. - The reason it seems so ephemeral is that your eyes can't be sure exactly where it is because they don't know where the edges of it are because the luminance of the sun and the sky against which it sits are practically the same.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I just tried the Monet thing. It's hard to believe it's going to work because the sun is such an intense colour against the sky. But in greyscale it just looks like a vague circular indent in the canvas. Thanks for sharing this, I'm going to look into it further.
( ,
Sun 18 Sep 2011, 1:48,
archived)