![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
when people get annoyed when they fuck things up on there.
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:03,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I think they must lack human compassion or something like that. Maybe they're robots or Daily Mail columnists.
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:16,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If Google didn't harvest your data, I'd be tempted to be the only person I know to move to Google+, followed by only having one friend there and sheepishly returning to Facebook a week later.
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:17,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i hate it and all my personal info is lies.
doesn't mean they're not still harvesting my data, like the filthy cyber-farmers they are
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:21,
archived)
doesn't mean they're not still harvesting my data, like the filthy cyber-farmers they are
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The most fucked up website changes I have seen since all this stuff got going in the nineties
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:16,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
they suck. people got angry. facebook ignored them and counted the money gained from hiding a bunch of privacy settings changes that opened everyone's profiles to advertisers and which were lost in the kerfuffle surrounding the nonsensical UI changes. everyone went home angry, except for mark zuckerberg who went home rich. and angry, because he's an ugly cunt.
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:26,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but Facebook have a history of doing it so I'm waiting til it gets onto the tech news.
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:35,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i think you vastly underestimate how lazy i am
edit: oh right, edit the fucking post, will you?
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:22,
archived)
edit: oh right, edit the fucking post, will you?
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
the trouble is it seems the updates hit after some random amount of time so I don't even know if I've had all the updates that people are complaining about. At first I thought it was just the shitty autolists (pointless anyway because the whole point of lists is so I know exactly who I'm sharing with) and making it easier to put people on the wrong list by having the option EVERYWHERE. Then a load of news feed and style changes hit which seem really crap. But people are talking about a mini-facebook in the top right, which I don't get (by which I mean it doesn't appear to be present for me). I just get the shit at the top of the newsfeed. Other than that it doesn't really seem to have changed too much. What am I missing?
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:27,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's ugly and it's pointless, and the little mini-facebook in the top right corner is even uglier and even more pointless, and they've kind of fucked up the settings you picked for the news feed (some weird "TOP STORIES" thing done on their own algorithm which it doesn't seem you have control over, and no "all"/"top" choice anymore) but it's not *that* different. Just ugly. And pointless. Like Mark Zuckerberg. And Randall Munroe.
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:37,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and ticking the blue triangles, thereby making EVERYTHING not a top story. Also, somebody said that switching language to "UK English" had the same effect...in any case the posts that have appeared in the past hour are not 'top stories'.
( ,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 1:00,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i'm guessing you're only posting because it's your b3taday, but you won't see your candle here, as you never donated you tightarsed prescum
( ,
Wed 21 Sep 2011, 23:39,
archived)