sorry
From the Merchandise for films that normally wouldn't have merchandise challenge. See all 239 entries (closed)
( , Sun 2 Oct 2011, 21:55, archived)
From the Merchandise for films that normally wouldn't have merchandise challenge. See all 239 entries (closed)
( , Sun 2 Oct 2011, 21:55, archived)
go on - do 'malcolm eggs'
or the 'eggs files'
Its a veritable never ending series of japes.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:00,
archived)
Its a veritable never ending series of japes.
hahaha
out of context, that just sounds brilliant as a name.
"Hi - my name is Jason Eggs" *hands business card*
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:04,
archived)
"Hi - my name is Jason Eggs" *hands business card*
its a good laugh, with lots of inventive deaths and one liners
i LOLed on the simulator bit with the sleeping bags
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:12,
archived)
we LOVE pre-marital sex!
the liquid nitrogen face-smash was the most inventive death i've seen in a film for a long time.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:14,
archived)
you made me want to search for that moment, just to enjoy it again
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ5YPlcCzYA
and yeah, the face smash was brilliant
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:15,
archived)
and yeah, the face smash was brilliant
i thought it was fucking terrible
im not much of a fan of american comic book movies, but it was really, really bad.
That liev shreiber is a good looking fella. Nice beard.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:12,
archived)
That liev shreiber is a good looking fella. Nice beard.
it really was.
on the plus side, finally watched star trek tonight.
it did not suck.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:13,
archived)
it did not suck.
i didnt like that much either, though it was better than eggs men
Too much baffling cinematography (CONSTANTLY sweeping / moving cameras, too much lens flares etc) and some sci-fi movie cliches that keep bugging me, like why did the baddies have to LOOK evil, and have a big pointy EVIL spaceship, that was all darkly lit and EVIL inside?
I hate it when sci-fi film baddies look evil just because they are evil. I mean, really - what benefit does a baddies ship have being poorly lit, full of chasms and deadly drops, sparks flying and loose tubing?
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:20,
archived)
I hate it when sci-fi film baddies look evil just because they are evil. I mean, really - what benefit does a baddies ship have being poorly lit, full of chasms and deadly drops, sparks flying and loose tubing?
the lensflare was a bit much
but as to why the bad guys have to look evil, well, the american film board view the american public as drooling spastic shitcunts, so they try to make things as easy on them as possible.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:23,
archived)
What was up with engineering?
It looked like a 20th century chemical plant. Not even the Enterprise on Star Trek:Enterprise looked that bad.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:34,
archived)
i thought the tech design on enterprise was excellent
futuristic, yet believable
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:42,
archived)
It did come out looking right
Managed to appear like what it was supposed to be, namely a lower-tech version of the original series, and without a big-arsed wide diameter metal pipe in sight! Shame it got cancelled; most of the stories in the final two years were rather good (and a hell of a lot better than Voyager).
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:57,
archived)
the xindi story arc was amazing, and i liked pretty much all of the crew members a lot.
It sickened me when i heard that bit in the new film where simon pegg killed porthos (archer's dog) in a transporter experiment. Cunts.
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 23:13,
archived)
i saw x3 and that wolverine one
both awful. the franchise is dead
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:13,
archived)
the man is an explosion-loving enigma
he interests me in sexy ways
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:25,
archived)
I do actually find moustaches rather attractive
but I prefer the thin, Errol Flynn style ones
( ,
Sun 2 Oct 2011, 22:32,
archived)