![Challenge Entry: Population Challenge [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

From the Population Challenge challenge. See all 76 entries (closed)
( , Thu 3 Nov 2011, 18:59, archived)

TJ: Has anyone here used Freelancer.com?
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:06,
archived)

although I expect you don't get a choice in the matter when he's around
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:14,
archived)

The one where that poor bloke had all those bad things happen to him based on how the audience voted.
All the time the audience just thought it was a game show so was expecting that no matter how bad things got it would be ok because well it just a fucking game show after all do of course they were going to the way they did after all the worse things got the better the end pay out for the victim, right?
The Brown goes and pulls the trick where it looks like its all fucked and the bloke us killed it seriously injured and then has the fucking audacity to blame the audience for the way they voted and how my h they should all feel like shit because they were all so easily led. I'd have fucking lynched him the arrogant wanker.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:19,
archived)
All the time the audience just thought it was a game show so was expecting that no matter how bad things got it would be ok because well it just a fucking game show after all do of course they were going to the way they did after all the worse things got the better the end pay out for the victim, right?
The Brown goes and pulls the trick where it looks like its all fucked and the bloke us killed it seriously injured and then has the fucking audacity to blame the audience for the way they voted and how my h they should all feel like shit because they were all so easily led. I'd have fucking lynched him the arrogant wanker.

but it sounds like a variation of the notorious Milgram experiment.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:28,
archived)

but more focused on deindividuation. People will be more liable to do something shite if they're part of a crowd, than if they are to be judged as an individual.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:31,
archived)

( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:33,
archived)

it can be applied to things such as rioters/looters, football violence, etc, where otherwise nice people break the law, sometimes disturbingly. I say lock them up and throw away the key, there's no room for this psychological science bollocks in politics.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:36,
archived)

Yes, "de-individually" lock up the scumbags and throw away the key. Yaaay! (imagine me doing finger quote marks)
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 21:03,
archived)

But it reminds me of this famous experiment:
everything2.com/title/Obedience+to+Authority
People are bastards.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:29,
archived)
everything2.com/title/Obedience+to+Authority
People are bastards.

kind of like a Milgram experiment, but done with a lot of people. I think it has some validity, though I agree that each decision was weighted in the way he presented the choices (I think that was necessary).
It's more likely that if the people in the audience were taken one-by-one into a room and asked to make the decisions by someone else, there would have been a major sway towards the less cruel (assuming the population of the audience was a roughly representative sample of the wider population).
It pissed me off that he didn't give a percentage of those voting for the cruelty after each decision. I like stats.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:29,
archived)
It's more likely that if the people in the audience were taken one-by-one into a room and asked to make the decisions by someone else, there would have been a major sway towards the less cruel (assuming the population of the audience was a roughly representative sample of the wider population).
It pissed me off that he didn't give a percentage of those voting for the cruelty after each decision. I like stats.

I'll raise you a Pavlov dog. Not relevant, just a famous experiment.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:37,
archived)