b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10636006 (Thread)

# damnit
one less voice of reason in the world :(
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 6:40, archived)
# I dunno toasty
To me he came across pretty much as opinionated and intolerant as the people whose beliefs he lambasted, and in his way he was just as dogmatic and entrenched in his own beliefs.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 6:52, archived)
# I have to admit that "reasonable" is not a word I would use to describe Hitchens.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 6:57, archived)
# well he never took to torturing people
like many in Iraq, Nicaragua, Venezuala and so forth that he spoke out against, so I'd say reasonable was quite apt.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:16, archived)
# I don't know of many circumstances where "reasonable" means "doesn't torture"
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:17, archived)
# Bwahaha!
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:19, archived)
# different definitions lol
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:22, archived)
# Which definition of "reasonable" means "doesn't torture"?
What an odd point to push.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:32, archived)
#
it is unreasonable to torture someone because you disagree with their beliefs.
it is reasonable to discuss how their beliefs differ and may be wrong.

or am I missing what you're trying to get at?
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:38, archived)
# The homeless guy on the corner that babbles nonsense at the top of his voice never tortured anyone either. I wouldn't describe him as reasonable.
And really, when the discussion of differing beliefs turns into hatred and bigotry then any semblance of reasonability flies out the window.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:40, archived)
# Bigotry from an athiest?
Well now I've got to go and read up Youtube up on him.
Usually we're supposed to say that people can believe in bullshit as long as they don't inconvenience the rest of us, or something like that.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:56, archived)
# Nope, he's solid XD
I like Douglas Adams:

[probably paraphrasing]

I like thinking about religion, it raises interesting questions, like "Where did it come from, why is it here, how long will it stay?"
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 9:11, archived)
# ?
All his arguments regarding religion were firmly based on the available evidence. I cant think of a more reasonable standpoint than that. He hated those who killed or harmed others in the name of their religion or had a hand in propagating lies across the world but for the average 'spiritual person' in the street there was only pity.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 9:51, archived)
# he did divide people on many subjects
such is opinion
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:15, archived)
# His cancer memoirs in Vanity Fair were very moving.
I found him far more tolerable a voice against religion than Dawkins.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 7:43, archived)
# Opinion dude?
Lotsa' facts as well.
There isn't a single fact in opposition to the weirder parts of mythology.

//edit: oh man did I misstate that ;p

Douglas Adams said that he used to be "polite" about it too.
Now he's all burning in hell and stuff*.













*May not be true
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 9:00, archived)
# That career in full
A: Black!
B: White!
A: Black!
B: White!
Hitchens: It's obviously blue. But, to draw on Dr. Johnson somewhat, colours are all shit anyway. And you people are preening little hedge-pigs.
A&B: We hate you.

~fin~
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 10:52, archived)
# What Mofaha said.
Raving lunatics don't become 'reasonable' just because they agree with you.

There are plenty of raving lunatics I mostly agree with, while remaining aware that they are dicks.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 8:52, archived)
# So he was a dick
because he disagreed with you, very effectively?
And there are plenty of lunatics that you agree with?

Dude became reasonable by being reasonable, dude. Stop agreeing with the lunatics: good company or no company.

It sounds like you are already an atheist and ready to come out and join us.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 9:34, archived)
# No he was a dick, regardless of whether or not he disagreed with me.
(, Fri 16 Dec 2011, 9:56, archived)