From the Misunderstood Dialogue challenge. See all 283 entries (closed)
( , Wed 1 Feb 2012, 21:43, archived)
That's not a real gnome either.
In fact, I suspect its a faux gnome.
*runs away quickly*
EDIT: err... where did all the comments just go?
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 21:52,
archived)
*runs away quickly*
EDIT: err... where did all the comments just go?
You know mike, I've been thinking; that's one up to date gnome.
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 21:56,
archived)
Does not compute. Fatal exception error. Out of cheese.
*head explodes*
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 21:57,
archived)
You see, it's a pun on iPhone.
Because it's a gnome on an iPhone- iGnome.
I didn't think it was that hard to understand.
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 22:01,
archived)
I didn't think it was that hard to understand.
Heheh
I've just seen the scariest bin van ever. It has a huge robotic arm that can recognise the bins and grab them without the driver getting out.
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 21:55,
archived)
You do realise that come the robot revolution, that lorry will be know as a "grabber"
and people will flee it in terror...?
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 22:00,
archived)
It's not the grabbing that's terrifying. It's the crushing and the squeezing.
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 22:01,
archived)
Bear with me because this is gonna be a bit long...
I've often thought that scientists should have to calculate a "skynet potential" score for any piece of research that they do.
Scores would range between 0 (no chance that this invention could aid in the development of a mutinous supercomputer) and 10 (I'm actually developing a murderous supercomputer).
Any research with a score of 5 or greater would be banned forever.
( ,
Wed 1 Feb 2012, 23:45,
archived)
Scores would range between 0 (no chance that this invention could aid in the development of a mutinous supercomputer) and 10 (I'm actually developing a murderous supercomputer).
Any research with a score of 5 or greater would be banned forever.