
you're not getting paid to use them
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:22,
archived)

unless there is a queue for the manned tills and these are available, and I don't have any goods likely to confuse it
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:25,
archived)

Plus, it takes about half the time to use a till run by an actual human, rather than a stroppy machine.
Although, you're just as likely to get a stroppy human, especially in Tesco.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:28,
archived)
Although, you're just as likely to get a stroppy human, especially in Tesco.

Unless they employ students to maintain the machines, that is.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:53,
archived)

They don't serve people any quicker. The only reason they exist is because its cheaper to keep a machine going than to pay someone wages.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:53,
archived)

which is easier to do when you have a computer manning your tills
it's the circle of life
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 16:12,
archived)
it's the circle of life

you'd be fucking mental not to use the self-scan thing
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:34,
archived)

they have to have a seperate shop next door
they'd be fucking mental to not have staff behind the counter in the bottle shop
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:36,
archived)
they'd be fucking mental to not have staff behind the counter in the bottle shop

so you end up standing there for ages anyway :(
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:40,
archived)

and the manned till queues would move quicker if they had a few more of them and not these taking up the space.
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 15:36,
archived)

There should be a discount for using the machines. A refund of the wages that Tesco are saving. I have only used the machines three times, and each time they tried to cause some kind of fight by whining about the items. Never got through one without a staff member involved.
As to the "one case of beer" - this is what the fag counter is for. :)
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 16:24,
archived)
As to the "one case of beer" - this is what the fag counter is for. :)

...and the queue's usually a lot quicker. I think the shuffling masses don't realise that a queue that's twice as long, but for four tills, goes twice as fast. That, and luddites refuse to use them.
The trick is to not bother trying to put things into bags on the scales -- that just confuses the POS*. Beep everything through, then bag it after you've paid.
The ones with a big coin chute instead of a slot are also handy for getting rid of change. I periodically dump the shrapnel from my wallet into one, then pay the remainder by card like I planned to anyway. Fuck you, Coinstar.
* Point of Sale? Yes! Piece of Shit? Also yes!
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 16:44,
archived)
The trick is to not bother trying to put things into bags on the scales -- that just confuses the POS*. Beep everything through, then bag it after you've paid.
The ones with a big coin chute instead of a slot are also handy for getting rid of change. I periodically dump the shrapnel from my wallet into one, then pay the remainder by card like I planned to anyway. Fuck you, Coinstar.
* Point of Sale? Yes! Piece of Shit? Also yes!

What, do you get a kick out of the looks of quiet despair from the poor bastards, as they sit there in their dead-end jobs... staring consumerism in its greasy, flabby face, day in, day out... wondering, as the pointless years drift away, where they went wrong in their lives?
You've still got to pick up all your crap beforehand to put it on the conveyor, and again to bag it up at the other side, so all the effort a manned till saves you is, er, orienting it so the barcode points at the scanner.
Robotills save the shop "menial work", sure, but they cost the customer an utterly negligible amount of work, if any, compared to the alternative. "Amount of work done" is not a fixed value, otherwise supermarkets could make your shopping run less work by paying people to jump up and down.
In other words, you're flat-out wrong... shall I just put you down under "luddite"?
( ,
Mon 7 May 2012, 22:10,
archived)
You've still got to pick up all your crap beforehand to put it on the conveyor, and again to bag it up at the other side, so all the effort a manned till saves you is, er, orienting it so the barcode points at the scanner.
Robotills save the shop "menial work", sure, but they cost the customer an utterly negligible amount of work, if any, compared to the alternative. "Amount of work done" is not a fixed value, otherwise supermarkets could make your shopping run less work by paying people to jump up and down.
In other words, you're flat-out wrong... shall I just put you down under "luddite"?